Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673200›Full record

ArticleJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban2015

Effect of high frequency oscillatory ventilation on EVLW and lung capillary permeability of piglets with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pulmonary and extrapulmonary insults.

Qiu-Jie Li, Yin Yuan, Yu-Mei Li, Le-Ying Sun, Shi-Ying Yuan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiu-Jie LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Yin YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. simiyy721@163.com.
Yu-Mei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Le-Ying SunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Shi-Ying YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) at early stage on hemodynamic parameters, extravascular lung water (EVLW), lung capillary permeability, CC16 and sICAM-1 in piglets with pulmonary or extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was explored. Central vein pressure (CVP) and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) were monitored in 12 anesthetized and intubated healthy piglets. Pulmonary ARDS (ARDSp) and extrapulmonary ARDS (ARDSexp) models were respectively established by lung lavage of saline solution and intravenous injection of oleic acid. Then the piglets received HFOV for 4 h. EVLW index (EVLWI), EVLW/intratroracic blood volume (ITBV) and pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) were measured before and after modeling (T0 and T1), and T2 (1 h), T3 (2 h), T4 (3 h) and T5 (4 h) after HFOV. CC16 and sICAM-1 were also detected at T1 and T5. Results showed at T1, T3, T4 and T5, EVLWI was increased more significantly in ARDSp group than in ARDSexp group (P<0.05). The EVLWI in ARDSp group was increased at T1 (P=0.008), and sustained continuously within 2 h (P=0.679, P=0.216), but decreased at T4 (P=0.007) and T5 (P=0.037). The EVLWI in ARDSexp group was also increased at T1 (P=0.003), but significantly decreased at T3 (P=0.002) and T4 (P=0.019). PVPI was increased after modeling in both two groups (P=0.004, P=0.012), but there was no significant change within 4 h (T5) under HFOV in ARDSp group, while PVPI showed the increasing trends at first, then decreased in ARDSexp group after HFOV. The changes of EVLW/ITBV were similar to those of PVPI. No significant differences were found in ΔEVLWI (P=0.13), ΔPVPI (P=0.28) and ΔEVLW/ITBV between the two groups (P=0.63). The significant decreases in both CC16 and sICAM-1 were found in both two groups 4 h after HFOV, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. It was concluded that EVLWI and lung capillary permeability were markedly increased in ARDSp and ARDSexp groups. EVLW could be decreased 4 h after the HFOV treatment. HFOV, EVLW/ITBV and PVPI were increased slightly at first, and then decreased in ARDSexp group, while in ARDSp group no significant difference was found after modeling. No significant differences were found in the decreases in EVLW and lung capillary permeability 4 h after HFOV.

Indexed as

High-Frequency VentilationAnimalsCapillariesLungRespiratory Distress SyndromeSwine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.