Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673184›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2015

A tool to utilize adverse effect profiles to identify brain-active medications for repurposing.

Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting Drug Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration with Adverse Event Report Embeddings.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas H McCoyCenter for Experimental Drugs and Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Drs McCoy and Perlis).
Roy H PerlisCenter for Experimental Drugs and Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Drs McCoy and Perlis). rperlis@partners.org.

Funding

Fostering Research Mentorship & Training during Psychiatry Residency SupplementR25MH094612 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FAVA, MAURIZIO, GREENFIELD, SHELLY F. · 2011 to 2022
$2.3M
Building a Risk Stratification Model for Treatment Resistance in Major DepressiveR01MH086026 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R25MH094612NIMH NIH HHS MH086026NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086026NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH094612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo shorten the time required to bring new treatments to clinics, recent efforts have focused on repurposing existing Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs with established safety data for new indications. We hypothesized that adverse effect profiles might aid in prioritizing compounds for investigation in central nervous system (CNS) applications by providing an indication of their abilities to cross the blood-brain barrier.

methodsData were drawn from an investigation of similarity of adverse effect profiles, utilizing pre- and post-marketing data. A panel of known CNS-active drugs was utilized to estimate aggregate similarity profiles for all other FDA drugs in the database. Permutations were used to test whether similarities for any given drug exceeded that expected under the null hypothesis. To estimate the performance of algorithms using such profiles, manually-curated lists of known CNS-active and -inactive medications were classified using logistic regression. Algorithms with and without this similarity data were compared for prediction of CNS penetrance.

resultsModels incorporating adverse effect similarity data exhibited greater discrimination of brain-penetrant and non-penetrant drugs than models without this data. A visualization tool was developed to allow any medication to be evaluated for adverse effect similarity to the CNS panel or a custom panel.

conclusionsConsideration of adverse effect profiles allows in silico prioritization of compounds for follow-up investigation for CNS indications. In concert with chemical screening approaches, this may accelerate repurposing efforts for putative CNS-active medications.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLogistic ModelsROC CurveCentral Nervous System Agentsadverse effectsbioinformaticschemical screeningdrug discoveryrepurposing

Identifiers

PMID25673184
PMCPMC4360243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.