Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673112›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2015

Blood pressure levels and control in Italy: comprehensive analysis of clinical data from 2000-2005 and 2005-2011 hypertension surveys.

G Tocci, A Ferrucci, R Pontremoli, C Ferri, E A Rosei, A Morganti, B Trimarco, G Mancia, C Borghi, M Volpe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Home Blood Pressure and Telemedicine: A Modern Approach for Managing Hypertension During and After COVID-19 Pandemic.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  6. Hypertension Management and Control in Italy: A Real-World Survey in Elderly Patients.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Article
  7. ARB-Based Combination Therapy for the Clinical Management of Hypertension and Hypertension-Related Comorbidities: A Spotlight on Their Use in COVID-19 Patients.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Blood Pressure Targets Achievement According to 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines in Three European Excellence Centers for Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Executive Summary of the 2018 Joint Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Italy.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. How to Improve Effectiveness and Adherence to Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: Central Role of Dihydropyridinic Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

G TocciDivision of Cardiology, Department of Clinical ansd Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
A FerrucciDivision of Cardiology, Department of Clinical ansd Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
R PontremoliDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genova and IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
C FerriDepartment of Internal Medicine and Public Health, University of L'Aquila, Coppito (AQ), Italy.
E A RoseiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Division of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
A MorgantiChair and Division of Internal Medicine, Hypertension Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
B TrimarcoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
G ManciaIstituto Auxologico Italiano and Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, University of Milano Milan, Italy.
C BorghiDivision of Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Policlinico Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
M VolpeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Clinical ansd Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale San Giuseppe · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This analysis is aimed to determine blood pressure (BP) levels and BP control rates in a large population of hypertensive patients in Italy. Data were taken from two large and inclusive cross-sectional surveys, which covered two distinct and subsequent time periods (2000-2005 and 2005-2011, respectively). Observational clinical studies and surveys, which reported average systolic/diastolic clinic BP levels, proportions of treated/untreated and controlled/uncontrolled patients, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive patients followed in either outpatient clinics, hypertension centres or general practice, were considered for the analyses. The overall sample included 211 591 hypertensive patients (119 997 (56.7%) women, age 57.0±10.0 years, body mass index 26.9±4.0 kg m(-2), BP levels 146.9±16.7/88.7±9.6 mm Hg). BP levels were 148.2±15.4/87.5±9.3 mm Hg in patients followed by general practitioners (n=168 313, 79.5%), 148.1±17.3/90.1±9.7 mm Hg in those followed by hypertension centres (n=28 180, 13.3%), and 142.4±17.6/86.6±9.8 mm Hg in those followed by outpatient clinics and hospital divisions (n=15 098, 7.1%). Among treated hypertensive patients (n=128 079; 60.5%), 43 008 (33.6%) were reported to have controlled BP levels. Over one decade of observation, we reported that ~60% of hypertensive patients were treated and among these only 33% achieved effective BP control. These findings highlight the need for more effective interventions to improve management of hypertension in Italy.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansHypertensionItalyObservational Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25673112
OpenAlexW2066847342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.