Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673085›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Cancer2015

Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology.

Eric C Dietze, Christopher Sistrunk, Gustavo Miranda-Carboni, Ruth O'Regan, Victoria L Seewaldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 335 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
335citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

335 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast cancer polygenic risk score performance varies by socioeconomic status.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

275 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric C Dietze1] Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. [2].
Christopher Sistrunk1] Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. [2].
Gustavo Miranda-Carboni1] University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 90095, USA. [2].
Ruth O'Regan1] Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. [2].
Victoria L Seewaldt1] Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. [2].

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Combined Breast MRI/Biomarker Strategies to Identify Aggressive BiologyU01CA189283 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CLINTON, STEVEN K, MIRANDA-CARBONI, GUSTAVO ADOLFO · 2015 to 2020
$4.0M
Tension-Stat3-miR-mediated metastasisR01CA192914 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEEWALDT, VICTORIA L., WEAVER, VALERIE MARIE · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Mechanisms of breast cancer associated with obesityR01CA170851 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI KUPERWASSER, CHARLOTTE, SEEWALDT, VICTORIA L. · 2012 to 2015
$2.6M
KCNK9 Imprinting in Breast Cancer Progression and MetastasisR01CA155664 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SEEWALDT, VICTORIA L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Targeted Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: From the Bench to Clinical TestingR01CA158668 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SEEWALDT, VICTORIA L. · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA155664‑03S1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155664NCI NIH HHS R01CA155664NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158668NCI NIH HHS R01CA158668NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170851NCI NIH HHS R01CA170851NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192914NCI NIH HHS U01 CA189283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype that disproportionately affects BRCA1 mutation carriers and young women of African origin. There is evidence that African-American women with TNBC have worse clinical outcomes than women of European descent. However, it is unclear whether survival differences persist after adjusting for disparities in access to health-care treatment, co-morbid disease and income. It remains controversial whether TNBC in African-American women is a molecularly distinct disease or whether African-American women have a higher incidence of aggressive biology driven by disparities: there is evidence in support of both. Understanding the relative contributions of biology and disparities is essential for improving the poor survival rate of African-American women with TNBC.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansIncidenceTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID25673085
PMCPMC5470637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.