Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673037›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2015

Individualized Therapy Is a Long-Term Cost-Effective Method Compared to Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients Failing Infliximab.

Casper Steenholdt, Jørn Brynskov, Ole Ø Thomsen, Lars K Munck, Jan Fallingborg, Lisbet A Christensen, Gitte Pedersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Bent A Jacobsen, Anne Sophie Oxholm and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Appropriate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Agents for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Casper SteenholdtDepartment of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark, steenholdt@brygge.dk.
Jørn Brynskov
Ole Ø Thomsen
Lars K Munck
Jan Fallingborg
Lisbet A Christensen
Gitte Pedersen
Jens Kjeldsen
Bent A Jacobsen
Anne Sophie Oxholm
Jakob Kjellberg
Klaus Bendtzen
Mark A Ainsworth
Herlev Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Crohn's disease patients failing infliximab therapy, interventions defined by an algorithm based on infliximab and anti-infliximab antibody measurements have proven more cost-effective than intensifying the infliximab regimen.

aimThis study investigated long-term economic outcomes at the week 20 follow-up study visit and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes were assessed at week 20.

methodsFollow-up from a 12-week, single-blind, clinical trial where patients with infliximab treatment failure were randomized to infliximab intensification (5 mg/kg every 4 weeks) (n = 36), or algorithm-defined interventions (n = 33). Accumulated costs, expressed as mean costs per patient, were based on the Danish National Patient Registry.

resultsAt the scheduled week 20 follow-up study visit, response and remission rates were similar in all study subpopulations between patients treated by the algorithm or by infliximab intensification. However, the sum of healthcare costs related to Crohn's disease was substantially lower (31 %) for patients randomized to algorithm-based interventions than infliximab intensification in the intention-to-treat population: $11,940 versus $17,236; p = 0.005. For per-protocol patients (n = 55), costs at the week 20 follow-up visit were even lower (49 %) in the algorithm group: $8,742 versus $17,236; p = 0.002. Figures were similar for patients having completed the 12-week trial as per protocol (50 % reduction in costs) (n = 45). Among patients continuing the allocated study intervention throughout the entire 20-week follow-up period (n = 29), costs were reduced by 60 % in algorithm-treated patients: $7,056 versus $17,776; p < 0.001. Cost-reduction percentages remained stable throughout one year.

conclusionEconomic benefit of algorithm-based interventions at infliximab failure is maintained throughout 1 year.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCost-Benefit AnalysisCrohn DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansInfliximabIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID25673037
OpenAlexW1995734769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.