ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014
Is nosocomial infection really the major cause of death in sepsis?
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with ICU-acquired infections in sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Trial
- Sepsis-related immunosuppression: a comprehensive review of current research breakthroughs.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Genetic associations between autoimmune diseases and the risks of severe sepsis and 28-day mortality: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Polymicrobial Sepsis Impairs Antigen-Specific Memory CD4 T Cell-Mediated Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Clinical characteristics, risk factors, immune status and prognosis of secondary infection of sepsis: a retrospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2019Observational
- The association between autoimmune disease and 30-day mortality among sepsis ICU patients: a cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Article
- Heterogeneity in sepsis: new biological evidence with clinical applications.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- Incidence, risk factors and impact on outcomes of secondary infection in patients with septic shock: an 8-year retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.