Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25672852›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

Detection and phasing of single base de novo mutations in biopsies from human in vitro fertilized embryos by advanced whole-genome sequencing.

Brock A Peters, Bahram G Kermani, Oleg Alferov, Misha R Agarwal, Mark A McElwain, Natali Gulbahce, Daniel M Hayden, Y Tom Tang, Rebecca Yu Zhang, Rick Tearle and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The evolving role of genetic tests in reproductive medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. Haploseek: a 24-hour all-in-one method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of monogenic disease and aneuploidy.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brock A PetersComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA; BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 51803, China; bpeters@completegenomics.com rdrmanac@completegenomics.com.
Bahram G KermaniComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Oleg AlferovComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Misha R AgarwalComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Mark A McElwainComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Natali GulbahceComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Daniel M HaydenComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Y Tom TangComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA; BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 51803, China;
Rebecca Yu ZhangComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Rick TearleComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Birgit CrainComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA;
Renata PratesReprogenetics, Livingston, New Jersey 07039, USA;
Alan BerkeleyNYU Fertility Center, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Santiago MunnéReprogenetics, Livingston, New Jersey 07039, USA;
Radoje DrmanacComplete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, California 94043, USA; BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 51803, China;
Complete Genomics (United States) · USBGI Group (China) · CNReprogenetics · USNew Hope Fertility Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the methods available for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos do not detect de novo single-nucleotide and short indel mutations, which have been shown to cause a large fraction of genetic diseases. Detection of all these types of mutations requires whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In this study, advanced massively parallel WGS was performed on three 5- to 10-cell biopsies from two blastocyst-stage embryos. Both parents and paternal grandparents were also analyzed to allow for accurate measurements of false-positive and false-negative error rates. Overall, >95% of each genome was called. In the embryos, experimentally derived haplotypes and barcoded read data were used to detect and phase up to 82% of de novo single base mutations with a false-positive rate of about one error per Gb, resulting in fewer than 10 such errors per embryo. This represents a ∼ 100-fold lower error rate than previously published from 10 cells, and it is the first demonstration that advanced WGS can be used to accurately identify these de novo mutations in spite of the thousands of false-positive errors introduced by the extensive DNA amplification required for deep sequencing. Using haplotype information, we also demonstrate how small de novo deletions could be detected. These results suggest that phased WGS using barcoded DNA could be used in the future as part of the PGD process to maximize comprehensiveness in detecting disease-causing mutations and to reduce the incidence of genetic diseases.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianFertilization in VitroGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPoint MutationBlastocystExonsHaplotypesHeterozygoteHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Deletion

Identifiers

PMID25672852
PMCPMC4352880
OpenAlexW2129228288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.