Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25672782›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2015

Species typing in dermal leishmaniasis.

Gert Van der Auwera, Jean-Claude Dujardin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Species Typing of Trypanosomatids Using Amplicon-Based Sequencing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Validation of a Real-Time PCR for the Diagnosis ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  15. ComparativeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic Variability in Leishmaniasis-CausingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gert Van der AuweraInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium gvdauwera@itg.be.
Jean-Claude DujardinInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium Antwerp University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmania is an infectious protozoan parasite related to African and American trypanosomes. All Leishmania species that are pathogenic to humans can cause dermal disease. When one is confronted with cutaneous leishmaniasis, identification of the causative species is relevant in both clinical and epidemiological studies, case management, and control. This review gives an overview of the currently existing and most used assays for species discrimination, with a critical appraisal of the limitations of each technique. The consensus taxonomy for the genus is outlined, including debatable species designations. Finally, a numerical literature analysis is presented that describes which methods are most used in various countries and regions in the world, and for which purposes.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousPolymerase Chain ReactionSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25672782
PMCPMC4402951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.