Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25672394›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Replication fork integrity and intra-S phase checkpoint suppress gene amplification.

Anna Kondratova, Takaaki Watanabe, Michael Marotta, Matthew Cannon, Anca M Segall, David Serre, Hisashi Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Around and beyond 53BP1 Nuclear Bodies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna KondratovaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Takaaki WatanabeDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA.
Michael MarottaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Matthew CannonGenomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anca M SegallDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
David SerreGenomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hisashi TanakaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA Hisashi.Tanaka@cshs.org.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA132384 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2022
$20.7M
Research Education CoreU54CA132379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARREDONDO, ELVA M, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2021
$16.1M
Mechanisms of gene amplification in human cancersR01CA149385 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI TANAKA, HISASHI · 2010 to 2022
$3.4M
Novel antibiotics that trap Holliday junctionsR01AI058253 · NIAID · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEGALL, ANCA MARA · 2004 to 2008
$2.3M
Molecular Basis and Consequences of Early Developmental Epigenetic ProgrammingR01DK088824 · NIDDK · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI SERRE, DAVID · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA149385NCI NIH HHS U54CA132379NCI NIH HHS U54CA132384NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene amplification is a phenotype-causing form of chromosome instability and is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells with mutant p53 lose G1/S checkpoint and are permissive to gene amplification. In this study we show that mammalian cells become proficient for spontaneous gene amplification when the function of the DSB repair protein complex MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) is impaired. Cells with impaired MRN complex experienced severe replication stress and gained substrates for gene amplification during replication, as evidenced by the increase of replication-associated single-stranded breaks that were converted to DSBs most likely through replication fork reversal. Impaired MRN complex directly compromised ATM/ATR-mediated checkpoints and allowed cells to progress through cell cycle in the presence of DSBs. Such compromised intra-S phase checkpoints promoted gene amplification independently from mutant p53. Finally, cells adapted to endogenous replication stress by globally suppressing genes for DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Our results indicate that the MRN complex suppresses gene amplification by stabilizing replication forks and by securing DNA damage response to replication-associated DSBs.

Indexed as

DNA RepairGene AmplificationAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBlotting, WesternCell Cycle ProteinsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA Repair EnzymesDNA ReplicationFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesNuclear ProteinsTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25672394
PMCPMC4357702
OpenAlexW2134540718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.