Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25672376›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of oncology2015

Diffusion MRI quality control and functional diffusion map results in ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625: a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma.

Benjamin M Ellingson, Eunhee Kim, Davis C Woodworth, Helga Marques, Jerrold L Boxerman, Yair Safriel, Robert C McKinstry, Felix Bokstein, Rajan Jain, T Linda Chi and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin M EllingsonUCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eunhee KimCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Davis C WoodworthDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Helga MarquesCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jerrold L BoxermanDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Yair SafrielRadiology Associates of Clearwater, University of South Florida, Clearwater, FL, USA.
Robert C McKinstryMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Felix BoksteinNeuro-Oncology Service, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.
Rajan JainDepartments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
T Linda ChiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
A Gregory SorensenA.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Mark R GilbertDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel P BarboriakDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Brown University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USDuke University · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILUniversity of South Florida · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
ARRA - ADOPT New Technologies for RDC/CDMSU01CA080098 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SCHNALL, MITCHELL D. · 1999 to 2011
$182.7M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
RTOG Foreign AccrualU10CA021661 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI CURRAN, WALTER J. · 1985 to 2013
$150.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
BIOSTATISTICS DATA MANAGEMENT CENTER FOR ACROINU01CA079778 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GATSONIS, CONSTANTINE A. · 1999 to 2011
$48.6M
Cell invasion, motility, and proliferation level estimate maps in gliomasR21CA167354 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ELLINGSON, BENJAMIN M. · 2012 to 2013
$358k
NCI NIH HHS 1 R21 CA167354-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA167354NCI NIH HHS U01 CA079778NCI NIH HHS U01 CA080098NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional diffusion mapping (fDM) is a cancer imaging technique that quantifies voxelwise changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Previous studies have shown value of fDMs in bevacizumab therapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The aim of the present study was to implement explicit criteria for diffusion MRI quality control and independently evaluate fDM performance in a multicenter clinical trial (RTOG 0625/ACRIN 6677). A total of 123 patients were enrolled in the current multicenter trial and signed institutional review board-approved informed consent at their respective institutions. MRI was acquired prior to and 8 weeks following therapy. A 5-point QC scoring system was used to evaluate DWI quality. fDM performance was evaluated according to the correlation of these metrics with PFS and OS at the first follow-up time-point. Results showed ADC variability of 7.3% in NAWM and 10.5% in CSF. A total of 68% of patients had usable DWI data and 47% of patients had high quality DWI data when also excluding patients that progressed before the first follow-up. fDM performance was improved by using only the highest quality DWI. High pre-treatment contrast enhancing tumor volume was associated with shorter PFS and OS. A high volume fraction of increasing ADC after therapy was associated with shorter PFS, while a high volume fraction of decreasing ADC was associated with shorter OS. In summary, DWI in multicenter trials are currently of limited value due to image quality. Improvements in consistency of image quality in multicenter trials are necessary for further advancement of DWI biomarkers.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ControlRecurrenceVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25672376
PMCPMC4383029
OpenAlexW2060619590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.