Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671814›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Coronary CT angiography in managing atherosclerosis.

Joachim Eckert, Marco Schmidt, Annett Magedanz, Thomas Voigtländer, Axel Schmermund

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Advances in CT Techniques in Vascular Calcification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joachim EckertCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Im Prüfling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany. j.eckert@ccb.de.
Marco SchmidtCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Im Prüfling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany. m.schmidt@ccb.de.
Annett MagedanzCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Im Prüfling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany. a.magedanz@ccb.de.
Thomas VoigtländerCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Im Prüfling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany. t.voigtlaender@ccb.de.
Axel SchmermundCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Im Prüfling 23, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany. a.schmermund@ccb.de.
Cardiovascular Center Bethanien · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the only method to image coronary arteries for a long time and is still the gold-standard. Technology of noninvasive imaging by coronary computed-tomography angiography (CCTA) has experienced remarkable progress during the last two decades. It is possible to visualize atherosclerotic lesions in the vessel wall in contrast to "lumenography" performed by ICA. Coronary artery disease can be ruled out by CCTA with excellent accuracy. The degree of stenoses is, however, often overestimated which impairs specificity. Atherosclerotic lesions can be characterized as calcified, non-calcified and partially calcified. Calcified plaques are usually quantified using the Agatston-Score. Higher scores are correlated with worse cardiovascular outcome and increased risk of cardiac events. For non-calcified or partially calcified plaques different angiographic findings like positive remodelling, a large necrotic core or spotty calcification more frequently lead to myocardial infarctions. CCTA is an important tool with increasing clinical value for ruling out coronary artery disease or relevant stenoses as well as for advanced risk stratification.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrognosisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25671814
PMCPMC4346923
OpenAlexW2069239035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.