Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671707›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological and psychological interventions for the treatment of psychosis and schizophrenia in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Megan R Stafford, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Christina E Loucas, Anthony James, Chris Hollis, Max Birchwood, Tim Kendall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04799717 (Game-based Telehealth Therapeutic Intervention in First Onset Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04799717 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Game-based Telehealth Therapeutic Intervention in First Onset Psychosis

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled8ConditionsPsychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia Spectrum DisordersArmsGaming session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan R StaffordNational Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom.
Evan Mayo-WilsonCentre for Outcomes, Research & Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christina E LoucasNational Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony JamesHighfield Adolescent Unit, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chris HollisFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Max BirchwoodDivision of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Tim KendallNational Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH), Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies report contrasting results regarding the efficacy and safety of pharmacological, psychological, and combined interventions in psychosis and schizophrenia in children, adolescents and young adults.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis. Embase, Medline, PreMedline, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were searched to July 2013 without restriction to publication status. Randomised trials comparing any pharmacological, psychological, or combined intervention for psychosis and schizophrenia in children, adolescents and young adults were included. Studies were assessed for bias, and GRADE criteria were used to describe the quality of the results.

resultsTwenty-seven trials including 3067 participants were identified. Meta-analyses were performed for 12 comparisons: symptoms, relapse, global state, psychosocial functioning, depression, weight and discontinuation. Low quality evidence demonstrated that antipsychotics have small beneficial effects on psychotic symptoms (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.26), and a medium adverse effect on weight gain (WMD = 1.61, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.60) and discontinuation due to side effects (RR = 2.44, 95% CI, 1.12 to 5.31). There were no trials of psychological treatments in under-18 year olds. There was no evidence of an effect of psychological interventions on psychotic symptoms in an acute episode, or relapse rate, but low quality evidence of a large effect for family plus individual CBT on the number of days to relapse (WMD = 32.25, 95% CI -36.52 to -27.98).

conclusionsFor children, adolescents and young adults, the balance of risk and benefit of antipsychotics appears less favourable than in adults. Research is needed to establish the potential for psychological treatments, alone and in combination with antipsychotics, in this population.

Indexed as

SafetyAdolescentAntipsychotic AgentsChildHumansPsychotherapyPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25671707
PMCPMC4324833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.