Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671675›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2015

Recovery of visual search following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe, Kayela Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombea Department of Psychology , Washington State University , Pullman , WA , USA.
Kayela Robertson

Funding

Multidisciplinary undergraduate training program in Health-assistive Smart EnvironmentsR25AG046114 · NIA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, DIANE JOYCE, MINOR, BRYAN · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
Cognitive Recovery after Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS047690 · NINDS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, MAUREEN · 2004 to 2007
$609k
NIA NIH HHS R25 AG046114NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047690NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS47690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeficits in attentional abilities can significantly impact rehabilitation and recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study investigated the nature and recovery of preattentive (parallel) and attentive (serial) visual search abilities after TBI.

methodParticipants were 40 individuals with moderate to severe TBI who were tested following emergence from posttraumatic amnesia and approximately 8 months post injury, as well as 40 age- and education-matched controls. Preattentive (automatic) and attentive (controlled) visual search situations were created by manipulating the saliency of the target item amongst distractor items in visual displays. The relationship between preattentive and attentive visual search rates and follow-up community integration were also explored.

resultsThe results revealed intact parallel (automatic) processing skills in the TBI group both postacutely and at follow-up. In contrast, when attentional demands on visual search were increased by reducing the saliency of the target, the TBI group demonstrated poorer performances than the control group both postacutely and 8 months post injury. Neither preattentive nor attentive visual search slope values correlated with follow-up community integration.

conclusionsThese results suggest that utilizing intact preattentive visual search skills during rehabilitation may help to reduce high mental workload situations, thereby improving the rehabilitation process. For example, making commonly used objects more salient in the environment should increase reliance or more automatic visual search processes and reduce visual search time for individuals with TBI.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrain InjuriesCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeAttentionClosed head injuryOutcomeParallel and serial searchPreattentive processes

Identifiers

PMID25671675
PMCPMC4355332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.