Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671633›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2015

Washington State recreational marijuana legalization: parent and adolescent perceptions, knowledge, and discussions in a sample of low-income families.

W A Mason, Koren Hanson, Charles B Fleming, Jay L Ringle, Kevin P Haggerty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cannabis Policy Changes and Adolescent Cannabis Use: Evidence from Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using Facebook to Recruit Parents to Participate in a Family Program to Prevent Teen Drug Use.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W A Mason1Boys Town, National Research Institute, Crawford Street , Boys Town, Nebraska , USA.
Koren Hanson
Charles B Fleming
Jay L Ringle
Kevin P Haggerty

Funding

Skills Training for Parents and Teens to Improve the Transition to High SchoolR01DA025651 · NIDA · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI MASON, W ALEX · 2010 to 2014
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS 3R01DA025651NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn November 2012, Washington State and Colorado became the first states in the United States to legalize recreational marijuana use for adults, and Uruguay became the first country to allow the cultivation, distribution, possession, and use of marijuana. One possible consequence of these changes is increased adolescent marijuana use. Parents may mitigate this adverse consequence; however, whether parents and adolescents have accurate knowledge about the laws and are discussing marijuana use in light of the law changes is unknown.

objectiveWe examine perceptions, knowledge, and parent-child discussions about Washington State's recreational marijuana law in a sample of low-income families.

methodsParticipants were a subset of families (n = 115) in an ongoing study that originally recruited parents and adolescents from middle schools in Tacoma, Washington. In summer 2013, when students were entering the 11(th) grade, students and their parents were asked questions about the recreational marijuana law.

resultsParticipants perceived that their marijuana-related attitudes and behaviors changed little as a result of the law, and displayed uncertainty about what is legal and illegal. Most parents reported discussing the new law with their children but only occasionally, and conversations emphasized household rules, particularly among parent lifetime marijuana users compared to non-users. Conclusions/Importance: Results suggest that there should be a public health campaign focused on families that provides clear information about the recreational marijuana laws.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeParent-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultFamilyFemaleHumansKnowledgeMaleMarijuana SmokingParentsPerceptionPovertyWashingtonadolescentlawlegalizationmarijuana useparent

Identifiers

PMID25671633
PMCPMC4527608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.