Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671593›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2015

The Use of Technology in Participant Tracking and Study Retention: Lessons Learned From a Clinical Trials Network Study.

Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Robert P Schwartz, Anika A H Alvanzo, Monique S Weisman, Tiffany L Kyle, Eva M Turrigiano, Martha L Gibson, Livangelie Perez, Erin A McClure, Sara Clingerman and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. "I'm tired of seeing my friends die": Barriers and facilitators to participating in clinical trials among rural people who use drugs in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Social Media in the Urology Practice | Opinion: YES.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shannon Gwin Mitchella Friends Research Institute, Inc. , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Robert P Schwartza Friends Research Institute, Inc. , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Anika A H Alvanzob Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Monique S Weismanc The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Center of Hawaii , Kaneohe , Hawaii , USA.
Tiffany L Kyled The Center for Drug Free Living , Orlando , Florida , USA.
Eva M Turrigianoe New York Psychiatric Institute , New York , New York , USA.
Martha L Gibsonf Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health Center , Indianapolis , Indiana , USA.
Livangelie Perezd The Center for Drug Free Living , Orlando , Florida , USA.
Erin A McClureg Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , South Carolina , USA.
Sara Clingermanh Department of Epidemiology , University of Miami , Orlando , Florida , USA.
Autumn Froiasi Stanley Street Treatment and Resources , Fall River , Massachusetts , USA.
Danielle R Shanderaj Evergreen Manor , Everett , Washington , USA.
Robrina Walkerk University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , Texas , USA.
Dean L Babcockf Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health Center , Indianapolis , Indiana , USA.
Genie L Baileyi Stanley Street Treatment and Resources , Fall River , Massachusetts , USA.
Gloria M Mielel Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York , New York , USA.
Lynn E Kunkelm Oregon Health & Science University , Eugene , Oregon , USA.
Michael Nortonn Midwestern Connecticut Council on Alcoholism , Danbury , Connecticut , USA.
Maxine L Stitzero Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.

Funding

Project-004UG1DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steven J Shoptaw, MADHUKAR H. TRIVEDI · 2015 to 2026
$71.6M
CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK MID-ATLANTIC COLLABORATIVE GROUPU10DA013034 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P, STITZER, MAXINE L · 1999 to 2015
$25.2M
Concept ProjectU10DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2005 to 2015
$22.6M
Clinical Trials Network: Mid-Atlantic Integrated Care Research CollaborativeUG1DA013034 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P, STITZER, MAXINE L · 2015 to 2019
$11.0M
Clinical Scientists Training Program in Addictions at MUSCK12DA031794 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Kevin M. Gray, AIMEE L MCRAE-CLARK · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA031794NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013034NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA020024NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013034NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA020024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing use of newer communication and Internet technologies, even among low-income and transient populations, require research staff to update their outreach strategies to ensure high follow-up and participant retention rates. This paper presents the views of research assistants on the use of cell phones and the Internet to track participants in a multisite randomized trial of substance use disorder treatment.

methodsPreinterview questionnaires exploring tracking and other study-related activities were collected from 21 research staff across the 10 participating US sites. Data were then used to construct a semistructured interview guide that, in turn, was used to interview 12 of the same staff members. The questionnaires and interview data were entered in Atlas.ti and analyzed for emergent themes related to the use of technology for participant-tracking purposes.

resultsStudy staff reported that most participants had cell phones, despite having unstable physical addresses and landlines. The incoming call feature of most cell phones was useful for participants and research staff alike, and texting proved to have additional benefits. However, reliance on participants' cell phones also proved problematic. Even homeless participants were found to have access to the Internet through public libraries and could respond to study staff e-mails. Some study sites opened generic social media accounts, through which study staff sent private messages to participants. However, the institutional review board (IRB) approval process for tracking participants using social media at some sites was prohibitively lengthy. Internet searches through Google, national paid databases, obituaries, and judiciary Web sites were also helpful tools.

conclusionsResearch staff perceive that cell phones, Internet searches, and social networking sites were effective tools to achieve high follow-up rates in drug abuse research. Studies should incorporate cell phone, texting, and social network Web site information on locator forms; obtain IRB approval for contacting participants using social networking Web sites; and include Web searches, texting, and the use of social media in staff training as standard operating procedures.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneInternetHumansPatient ParticipationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial MediaClinical trialsparticipant trackingsocial mediatechnologytexting

Identifiers

PMID25671593
PMCPMC4532645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.