The HIV-positive transplant donor--change born of necessity.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Heart transplantation: advances in expanding the donor pool and xenotransplantation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024
   Review
2. Victory out of tragedy: organ donation.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024
   Review
3. Realizing HOPE: The Ethics of Organ Transplantation From HIV-Positive Donors.Annals of internal medicine · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive kidney transplantation--results at 3 to 5 years.2015

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as