Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671224›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2015

Drinking goal choice and outcomes in a Web-based alcohol intervention: results from VetChange.

Justin L Enggasser, John A Hermos, Amy Rubin, Mark Lachowicz, Denis Rybin, Deborah J Brief, Monica Roy, Eric Helmuth, David Rosenbloom, Terence M Keane

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Can reduced drinking be a viable goal for alcohol dependent patients?World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Justin L Enggasser
John A Hermos
Amy Rubin
Mark Lachowicz
Denis Rybin
Deborah J Brief
Monica Roy
Eric Helmuth
David Rosenbloom
Terence M Keane

Funding

Web-based Behavioral Intervention for Returning Veterans with Risky Alcohol UseRC1AA019248 · NIAAA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KEANE, TERENCE M · 2009 to 2010
$909k
NIAAA NIH HHS RC1 AA019248NIAAA NIH HHS RC1AA019248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of the paper are to describe characteristics of participants who chose moderation and abstinence drinking goals, and to examine post-treatment drinking outcomes based on patterns of goal choice during a Web-based alcohol intervention for returning U.S. Veterans.

methodWe conducted a descriptive secondary analysis of a subsample of 305 of 600 Veterans who participated in a clinical trial of VetChange, an 8-module, cognitive-behavioural intervention. Participants self-selected abstinence or moderation drinking goals, initially at Module 3, and weekly during subsequent modules. Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems were measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Quick Drink Screen (QDS), and Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R).

resultsInitial goal choices were 86.9% moderation and 13.1% abstinence. Approximately 20% of participants from each initial choice changed goals during the intervention; last goal choices were 68.6% moderation and 31.4% abstinence. Participants who initially chose moderation reported higher percent heavy drinking days at baseline; participants who initially chose abstinence were more likely to report recent substance abuse treatment and were older. Post-intervention levels of alcohol use and alcohol-related problems were significantly reduced in all goal-choice patterns (i.e., Moderation Only, Abstinence Only, Moderation to Abstinence, and Abstinence to Moderation; all measures p < 0.05 or less). Baseline drinking severity did not differentially relate to outcomes across goal-choice patterns.

conclusionsParticipants in a Web-based alcohol intervention for returning U.S. Veterans demonstrated improvements in drinking regardless of whether they chose an abstinence or moderation drinking goal, and whether the goal was maintained or changed over the course of the intervention.

Indexed as

Alcohol AbstinenceAlcohol DrinkingGoalsInternetAdultAlcoholismChoice BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeVeterans

Identifiers

PMID25671224
PMCPMC4390170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.