Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25671079›Full record

ReviewMedical gas research2014

A systematic review of neuroprotective strategies after cardiac arrest: from bench to bedside (part II-comprehensive protection).

Lei Huang, Patricia M Applegate, Jason W Gatling, Dustin B Mangus, John Zhang, Richard L Applegate

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical gas research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive and Functional Consequence of Cardiac Arrest.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA, USA ; Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Physiology and Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Patricia M ApplegateDepartment of Cardiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11201 Benton St, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Jason W GatlingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Dustin B MangusDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
John ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA, USA ; Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Physiology and Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA ; Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Richard L ApplegateDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11041 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocognitive deficits remain a significant source of morbidity in survivors of cardiac arrest. We conducted a literature review of treatment protocols designed to evaluate neurologic outcome and survival following global cerebral ischemia associated with cardiac arrest. The search was limited to investigational therapies that were implemented either during cardiopulmonary resuscitation or after return of spontaneous circulation in studies that included assessment of impact on neurologic outcome. Given that complex pathophysiology underlies global brain hypoxic ischemia following cardiac arrest, neuroprotective strategies targeting multiple stages of neuropathologic cascades should promise to improve survival and neurologic outcomes in cardiac arrest victims. In Part II of this review, we discuss several approaches that can provide comprehensive protection against global brain injury associated with cardiac arrest, by modulating multiple targets of neuropathologic cascades. Pharmaceutical approaches include adenosine and growth factors/hormones including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, insulin-like growth factor-1 and glycine-proline-glutamate, granulocyte colony stimulating factor and estrogen. Preclinical studies of these showed some benefit but were inconclusive in models of global brain injury involving systemic ischemia. Several medical gases that can mediate neuroprotection have been evaluated in experimental settings. These include hydrogen sulfide, hyperbaric oxygen and molecular hydrogen. Hyperbaric oxygen and molecular hydrogen showed promising results; however, further investigation is required prior to clinical application of these agents in cardiac arrest patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestComprehensive neuroprotectionGlobal brain injuryHydrogen gasHydrogen sulfideHyperbaric oxygenModelPharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID25671079
PMCPMC4322492
OpenAlexW2120373275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.