ArticleBMC anesthesiology2015
Association of time in blood glucose range with outcomes following cardiac surgery.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04765982 (Does Insulin Requirement Post Cardiac Surgery Predicts The Risk Of Developing Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Insulin Requirement Post Cardiac Surgery Predicts The Risk Of Developing Diabetes
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Recommendations for the Use of the Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Diabetes Care.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Guideline
- A Prospective Study on Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: Toward Glycemic Targets.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Trial
- A skin-interfaced three-dimensional closed-loop sensing and therapeutic electronic wound bandage.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Incidence and outcomes of early hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025Article
- Rationale and strategies for improving glycaemic control in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- The Association Between Time in Range %, Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Physical Health Agility Status Indices Amongst Older People with T2D: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Start Strong, Finish Strong: A Review of Prehabilitation in Cardiac Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Detection and Management of Perioperative Hyperglycemia at a Tertiary Cancer Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Blood Glucose Time in Range to Reduce Risk of Blood Glucose Extrusion and Improve Blood Glucose Metrics in Type 1 Diabetic Patients.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Article
- Article
- What, why and how to monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Association between time in range of relative normoglycemia and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a single-center retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Expert consensus on the glycemic management of critically ill patients.Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Article
- Individualizing Time-in-Range Goals in Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Role of Insulin: Clinical Insights From a Multinational Panel.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Review
- Intensive care outcome of left main stem disease surgery: A single center three years' experience.World journal of critical care medicine · 2021Article
- The Association of Mean Plasma Glucose and In hospital Death Proportion: A Retrospective, Cohort Study of 162,169 In-Patient Data.International journal of endocrinology · 2021Article
- Review
- Time in blood glucose range 70 to 180 mg/dL and survival rate in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Advances in Medical Nutrition Therapy: Parenteral Nutrition.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe importance of optimal postoperative glycemic control in cardiac patients remains unclear. Various glycemic targets have been prescribed to reduce wound infection and overall mortality rates. AIM OF THE WORK: To assess glucose control, as determined by time in range (TIR), in patients with glycemic targets of 6.0 to 8.1 mmol/L, and to determine factors related to poor control.
methodsThis prospective descriptive study evaluated 227 consecutive patients, 100 with and 127 without diabetes, after cardiac surgery. Patients received insulin to target glucose concentrations of 6.0 to 8.1 mmol/L. Data analyzed included patient age, gender, race, Euro score, cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB), aortic cross clamp time (ACC), length of ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and stay in the hospital. Patients were divided into two groups, those who maintained > 80% and < 80% TIR. Outcome variables were compared in diabetics and non-diabetics.
resultsPatients with >80% and <80% TIR were matched in age, sex, gender, and Euro score. Failure to maintain target glycemia was significantly more frequent in diabetics (p = 0.001), in patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 8% (p = 0.0001), and in patients taking dopamine (p = 0.04) and adrenaline (p = 0.05). Times of CPB and ACC, length of stay in the ICU and ventilation were significantly higher in patients with TIR <80% than >80%. Rates of hypoglycemia, acute kidney injury, and in-hospital mortality were similar in the two groups, although the incidence of wound infection was higher in patients with TIR <80%. Both diabetics and non-diabetics with low TIR had poorer outcomes, as shown by length of stay and POAF. No significant differences were found between the two ethnic groups (Arabs and Asians).
conclusionPatients with >80% TIR, whether or not diabetics, had better outcomes than those with <80% TIR, as determined by wound infection, lengths of ventilation and ICU stay. Additionally, they were not subject to frequent hypoglycemic events. Preoperatively high HbA1C is likely a good predictor of poor glycemic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.