ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Opinion: Reproducible research can still be wrong: adopting a prevention approach.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- A tropical geometry for bounded biochemical state spaces.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- A Statistical Framework for Measuring Reproducibility and Replicability of High-Throughput Experiments From Multiple Sources.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Approaching Significance: Statistical Guidance for Authors and Reviewers.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploratory Insights into Barriers and Open Practices for Computational Reproducibility in Scientific Research.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Linear regression reporting practices for health researchers, a cross-sectional meta-research study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Pragmatic reproducible research: improving the research process from raw data to results, bit by bit.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Beyond the horizon: immersive developments for animal ecology research.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023Article
- The impact of mortality underreporting on the association of ambient temperature and PMHeliyon · 2023Article
- The Riffomonas YouTube Channel: An Educational Resource To Foster Reproducible Research Practices.Microbiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Improving the reproducibility of findings by updating research methodology.Quality & quantity · 2022Article
- Perspective on reducing errors in research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Article
- A research parasite's perspective on establishing a baseline to avoid errors in secondary analyses.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Research perspectives on animal health in the era of artificial intelligence.Veterinary research · 2021Review
- Article
- Eight practices for data management to enable team data science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- EMULSION: Transparent and flexible multiscale stochastic models in human, animal and plant epidemiology.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- The virtuous cycle of human genetics and mouse models in drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.