Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25670796›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Zebrafish foxc1a drives appendage-specific neural circuit development.

Santanu Banerjee, Katharina Hayer, John B Hogenesch, Michael Granato

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanistic Insights into Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome from ZebrafishInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Open-Ended Inquiry into Zebrafish Nerve Development Using Image Analysis.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santanu BanerjeeDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Katharina HayerDepartment of Pharmacology and Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
John B HogeneschDepartment of Pharmacology and Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Michael GranatoDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA granatom@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Translational Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Molecular, Cellular and Physiological Mechanisms of the Mammalian Circadian ClockR01NS054794 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HOGENESCH, JOHN B, LIU, ANDREW C. · 2007 to 2022
$8.1M
AXONAL PATHWAY SELECTION IN THE ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOR01HD037975 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRANATO, MICHAEL · 1999 to 2014
$4.5M
Genetic analysis of axonal regenerationR01EY024861 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRANATO, MICHAEL · 2014 to 2023
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024861NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037975NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD37975NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS054794-06NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural connectivity between the spinal cord and paired appendages is key to the superior locomotion of tetrapods and aquatic vertebrates. In contrast to nerves that innervate axial muscles, those innervating appendages converge at a specialized structure, the plexus, where they topographically reorganize before navigating towards their muscle targets. Despite its importance for providing appendage mobility, the genetic program that drives nerve convergence at the plexus, as well as the functional role of this convergence, are not well understood. Here, we show that in zebrafish the transcription factor foxc1a is dispensable for trunk motor nerve guidance but is required to guide spinal nerves innervating the pectoral fins, equivalent to the tetrapod forelimbs. In foxc1a null mutants, instead of converging with other nerves at the plexus, pectoral fin nerves frequently bypass the plexus. We demonstrate that foxc1a expression in muscle cells delineating the nerve path between the spinal cord and the plexus region restores convergence at the plexus. By labeling individual fin nerves, we show that mutant nerves bypassing the plexus enter the fin at ectopic positions, yet innervate their designated target areas, suggesting that motor axons can select their appropriate fin target area independently of their migration through the plexus. Although foxc1a mutants display topographically correct fin innervation, mutant fin muscles exhibit a reduction in the levels of pre- and postsynaptic structures, concomitant with reduced pectoral fin function. Combined, our results reveal foxc1a as a key player in the development of connectivity between the spinal cord and paired appendages, which is crucial for appendage mobility.

Indexed as

Animal FinsAnimalsAxonsExtremitiesForkhead Transcription FactorsMotor NeuronsNeurogenesisZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxc1a protein, zebrafishZebrafish ProteinsAxon guidanceFin nervesFoxc1aLimb motor neuronMotor axonPectoral finPlexusZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25670796
PMCPMC4325381
OpenAlexW2115036468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.