ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a hospital electronic medication management system.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital Health Technology Interventions for Improving Medication Safety: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation costs of hospital-based computerised decision support systems: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of predictive risk models for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Theory-informed process evaluation protocol to assess a rapid-access outpatient model of care in South East Queensland, Australia.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Implementation and validation of a 24/7 system for the monitoring of antiepileptic drugs.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Benefits of electronic charts in intensive care and during a world health pandemic: advantages of the technology age.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- A Cost-Effectiveness Study Comparing Ready-to-Administer and Traditional Vial-and-Syringe Method for Opioids.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
- Clinical decision support system, using expert consensus-derived logic and natural language processing, decreased sedation-type order errors for patients undergoing endoscopy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Validation of a score to identify inpatients at risk of a drug-related problem during a 4-year period.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018Article
- Technology-induced errors associated with computerized provider order entry software for older patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Observational
- Why Economic Analysis of Health System Improvement Interventions Matters.Frontiers in public health · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of a hospital electronic medication management system (eMMS).
methodsWe compared costs and benefits of paper-based prescribing with a commercial eMMS (CSC MedChart) on one cardiology ward in a major 326-bed teaching hospital, assuming a 15-year time horizon and a health system perspective. The eMMS implementation and operating costs were obtained from the study site. We used data on eMMS effectiveness in reducing potential adverse drug events (ADEs), and potential ADEs intercepted, based on review of 1 202 patient charts before (n = 801) and after (n = 401) eMMS. These were combined with published estimates of actual ADEs and their costs.
resultsThe rate of potential ADEs following eMMS fell from 0.17 per admission to 0.05; a reduction of 71%. The annualized eMMS implementation, maintenance, and operating costs for the cardiology ward were A$61 741 (US$55 296). The estimated reduction in ADEs post eMMS was approximately 80 actual ADEs per year. The reduced costs associated with these ADEs were more than sufficient to offset the costs of the eMMS. Estimated savings resulting from eMMS implementation were A$63-66 (US$56-59) per admission (A$97 740-$102 000 per annum for this ward). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated results were robust when both eMMS effectiveness and costs of actual ADEs were varied substantially.
conclusionThe eMMS within this setting was more effective and less expensive than paper-based prescribing. Comparison with the few previous full economic evaluations available suggests a marked improvement in the cost-effectiveness of eMMS, largely driven by increased effectiveness of contemporary eMMs in reducing medication errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.