Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25670755›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Evaluating the impact of an integrated computer-based decision support with person-centered analytics for the management of asthma in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.

Robyn Tamblyn, Pierre Ernst, Nancy Winslade, Allen Huang, Roland Grad, Robert W Platt, Sara Ahmed, Teresa Moraga, Tewodros Eguale

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A cluster randomized controlled trial of an electronic medical record-based pathway for pediatric asthma in primary care in Alberta.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Pneumo news · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robyn TamblynDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada robyn.tamblyn@mcgill.ca.
Pierre ErnstCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nancy WinsladeClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Allen HuangDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Roland GradHerzl Family Practice Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Robert W PlattDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sara AhmedDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Teresa MoragaClinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tewodros EgualeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer-based decision support has been effective in providing alerts for preventive care. Our objective was to determine whether a personalized asthma management computer-based decision support increases the quality of asthma management and reduces the rate of out-of-control episodes.

methodsA cluster-randomized trial was conducted in Quebec, Canada among 81 primary care physicians and 4447 of their asthmatic patients. Patients were followed from the first visit for 3-33 months. The physician control group used the Medical Office of the 21st century (MOXXI) system, an integrated electronic health record. A custom-developed asthma decision support system was integrated within MOXXI and was activated for physicians in the intervention group.

resultsAt the first visit, 9.8% (intervention) to 12.9% (control) of patients had out-of-control asthma, which was defined as a patient having had an emergency room visit or hospitalization for respiratory-related problems and/or more than 250 doses of fast-acting β-agonist (FABA) dispensed in the past 3 months. By the end of the trial, there was a significant increase in the ratio of doses of inhaled corticosteroid use to fast-acting β-agonist (0.93 vs. 0.69: difference: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.02-0.51; P = 0.03) in the intervention group. The overall out-of-control asthma rate was 54.7 (control) and 46.2 (intervention) per 100 patients per year (100 PY), a non-significant rate difference of -8.7 (95% CI: -24.7, 7.3; P = 0.29). The intervention's effect was greater for patients with out-of-control asthma at the beginning of the study, a group who accounted for 44.7% of the 5597 out-of-control asthma events during follow-up, as there was a reduction in the event rate of -28.4 per 100 PY (95% CI: -55.6, -1.2; P = 0.04) compared to patients with in-control asthma at the beginning of the study (-0.08 [95% CI: -10.3, 8.6; P = 0.86]). DISCUSSION: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel computer-assisted ADS system that facilitates systematic monitoring of asthma control status, follow-up of patients with out of control asthma, and evidence-based, patient-specific treatment recommendations. We found that physicians were more likely to use ADS for out-of-control patients, that in the majority of these patients, they were advised to add an inhaled corticosteroid or a leukotriene inhibitor to the patient s treatment regimen, and the intervention significantly increased the mean ratio of inhaled corticosteroids to FABA during follow-up. It also reduced the rate of out-of-control episodes during follow up among patients whose asthma was out-of-control at the time of study entry. Future research should assess whether coupling patient-specific treatment recommendations, automated follow-up, and home care with comparative feedback on quality and outcomes of care can improve guideline adoption and care outcomes.

conclusionsA primary care-personalized asthma management system reduced the rate of out-of-control asthma episodes among patients whose asthma was poorly controlled at the study's onset.

Indexed as

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedAsthmaFemaleHumansMalePhysicians, Primary CarePrecision MedicinePrimary Health CareSingle-Blind MethodUser-Computer Interfaceasthmacomputer decision supportMOXXIout-of-controlpersonalized medicineRCT

Identifiers

PMID25670755
PMCPMC4482273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.