Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25670205›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2015

Providing care to vulnerable populations: a qualitative study among GPs working in deprived areas in Montreal, Canada.

Christine Loignon, Martin Fortin, Christophe Bedos, David Barbeau, Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier, Thomas Gottin, Émilie Goulet, Elisha Laprise, Jeannie L Haggerty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Not Available].Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine LoignonFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, christine.loignon@usherbrooke.ca.
Martin FortinFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
Christophe BedosFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec.
David BarbeauFaculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec.
Alexandrine Boudreault-FournierFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia and.
Thomas GottinFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
Émilie GouletFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
Elisha LapriseFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
Jeannie L HaggertyFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP200361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication barriers between persons living in poverty and healthcare professionals reduce care effectiveness. Little is known about the strategies general practitioners (GPs) use to enhance the effectiveness of care for their patients living in poverty.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify strategies adopted by GPs to deliver appropriate care to patients living in poverty.

methodsWe conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 35 GPs practising in Montreal, Canada, who regularly provide care to underprivileged patients in primary care clinics located in deprived urban areas. Analysis consisted of interview debriefing, transcript coding, thematic analysis and data interpretation.

resultsGPs develop specific skills for caring for these patients that are responsive to their complex medical needs and challenging social context. Our respondents used three main strategies in working with their patients: building a personal connection to overcome social distance, aligning medical expectations with patients' social vulnerability and working collaboratively to empower patients. With these strategies, the physicians were able to enhance the patient-physician relationship and to take into account the impact of poverty on illness self-management.

conclusionsOur results may help GPs improve the health and care experience of their vulnerable patients by adopting these strategies. The strategies' impacts on patients' experience of care and health outcomes should be evaluated as a prelude to integrating them into primary care practice and the training of future physicians.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPoverty AreasPrimary Health CareVulnerable PopulationsAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCommunication BarriersDelivery of Health CareFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamEquitypatient-centered carepovertyprimary health care.vulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID25670205
PMCPMC4371892
OpenAlexW2134149543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.