Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25670022›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology

Commentary on the contributions and future role of occupational exposure science in a vision and strategy for the discipline of exposure science.

Martin Harper, Christopher Weis, Joachim D Pleil, Benjamin C Blount, Aubrey Miller, Mark D Hoover, Steven Jahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Applying the exposome concept to working life health: The EU EPHOR project.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent Advances in Occupational Exposure Assessment of Aerosols.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Diet in Acne Vulgaris: Open or Solved Problem?Iranian journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin HarperExposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1095 Willowdale Road MS-3030, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Christopher WeisOffice of the Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Joachim D PleilMethods Development and Applications Branch, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin C BlountDivision of Laboratory Science, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Aubrey MillerOffice of the Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark D HooverDivision of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Steven JahnJahn Industrial Hygiene, Aiken, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure science is a holistic concept without prejudice to exposure source. Traditionally, measurements aimed at mitigating environmental exposures have not included exposures in the workplace, instead considering such exposures to be an internal affair between workers and their employers. Similarly, occupational (or industrial) hygiene has not typically accounted for environmental contributions to poor health at work. Many persons spend a significant amount of their lifetime in the workplace, where they maybe exposed to more numerous chemicals at higher levels than elsewhere in their environment. In addition, workplace chemical exposures and other exogenous stressors may increase epigenetic and germline modifications that are passed on to future generations. We provide a brief history of the development of exposure science from its roots in the assessment of workplace exposures, including an appendix where we detail current resources for education and training in exposure science offered through occupational hygiene organizations. We describe existing successful collaborations between occupational and environmental practitioners in the field of exposure science, which may serve as a model for future interactions. Finally, we provide an integrated vision for the field of exposure science, emphasizing interagency collaboration, the need for complete exposure information in epidemiological studies, and the importance of integrating occupational, environmental, and residential assessments. Our goal is to encourage communication and spur additional collaboration between the fields of occupational and environmental exposure assessment. Providing a more comprehensive approach to exposure science is critical to the study of the "exposome", which conceptualizes the totality of exposures throughout a person's life, not only chemical, but also from diet, stress, drugs, infection, and so on, and the individual response.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationOccupational ExposureEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MedicineEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOccupational MedicineRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25670022
PMCPMC4712444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.