Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25669637›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2015

Minimal invasive surgery: NOSE and NOTES in ulcerative colitis.

Marta M Tasende, Salvadora Delgado, Marta Jimenez, Gabriel Diaz Del Gobbo, María Fernández-Hevia, Borja DeLacy, Jaume Balust, Antonio M Lacy

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extraction Site in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Future Directions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [The technique of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J‑pouch : Standards and controversies].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta M TasendeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvadora DelgadoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta JimenezDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriel Diaz Del GobboDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
María Fernández-HeviaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Borja DeLacyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume BalustDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio M LacyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Centro Esther Koplowitz, Fundació Privada Cellex, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. alacy@clinic.ub.es.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), laparoscopic pelvic dissection for IPAA is not always straightforward: often, a hand-assistance incision is used to complete the proctectomy, lengthening operative times. Hybrid NOSE and NOTES are emerging as an alternative approach to conventional laparoscopy. We believe that UC patients could benefit from this new hybrid approach in three ways: by easing the proctectomy as performed down to up, avoiding additional incisions and decreasing surgical times. We present the short-term outcomes of our series.

methodsAll patients with UC who required IPAA were enrolled in a single-arm prospective study (July 2011 to March 2014). A three-step procedure was performed. The first step: laparoscopic colectomy (with transanal removal of the colon) and temporary ileostomy. The second step: "down-to-up" proctectomy (with transanal removal of the rectum) and IPAA with a covering ileostomy. We combined simultaneously transanal and laparoscopic approach. The third step: ileostomy closure. Functional outcomes were assessed 3 months after third step.

resultsEighteen patients were enrolled. Two patients are waiting to complete the second stage, and 16 underwent all surgical steps. Twelve have been evaluated with functional scores. For the first step, the mean operative time was 162.2 min (SD 40.5) and 170 min (SD 50.1) for the second one. The median hospital stay was 6 days (IQR 5-14.75) for the first step and 5.5 (IQR 5-9.75) for the second one. No major complications occurred. Twenty-four-hour defecation frequency was 5.5 per day (SD 1.7), 0.5 per night. Seventy-five percentage of patients may retain stools for more than 30 min; the mean value of Oresland score was 4.7 and Wexner score 1.4.

conclusionsThis is a safe and feasible technique to treat UC patients with good short-term outcomes. Long-term outcomes and controlled trials are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyColitis, UlcerativeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIleostomyLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOperative TimeBottom-up rectal dissectionNOSENOTESUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID25669637
OpenAlexW2033089512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.