Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25669457›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2015

From adaptive licensing to adaptive pathways: delivering a flexible life-span approach to bring new drugs to patients.

H-G Eichler, L G Baird, R Barker, B Bloechl-Daum, F Børlum-Kristensen, J Brown, R Chua, S Del Signore, U Dugan, J Ferguson and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Evidence-based health care with pharmaceuticals for rare diseases: the role of digitalisation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

H-G EichlerEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), London, UK.
L G Baird
R Barker
B Bloechl-Daum
F Børlum-Kristensen
J Brown
R Chua
S Del Signore
U Dugan
J Ferguson
S Garner
W Goettsch
J Haigh
P Honig
A Hoos
P Huckle
T Kondo
Y Le Cam
H Leufkens
R Lim
C Longson
M Lumpkin
J Maraganore
B O'Rourke
K Oye
E Pezalla
F Pignatti
J Raine
G Rasi
T Salmonson
D Samaha
S Schneeweiss
P D Siviero
M Skinner
J R Teagarden
T Tominaga
M R Trusheim
S Tunis
T F Unger
S Vamvakas
G Hirsch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of adaptive licensing (AL) has met with considerable interest. Yet some remain skeptical about its feasibility. Others argue that the focus and name of AL should be broadened. Against this background of ongoing debate, we examine the environmental changes that will likely make adaptive pathways the preferred approach in the future. The key drivers include: growing patient demand for timely access to promising therapies, emerging science leading to fragmentation of treatment populations, rising payer influence on product accessibility, and pressure on pharma/investors to ensure sustainability of drug development. We also discuss a number of environmental changes that will enable an adaptive paradigm. A life-span approach to bringing innovation to patients is expected to help address the perceived access vs. evidence trade-off, help de-risk drug development, and lead to better outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

LicensureDrug ApprovalDrug DiscoveryHumans

Identifiers

PMID25669457
PMCPMC6706805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.