Trial reportAntiviral therapy2015
Anaemia is associated with monocyte activation in HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy.
Trial report in Antiviral therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio with HIV viral load and anemia in HIV-positive patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- High levels of serum IL-6 and serum hepcidin and low CD4 cell count were risk factors of anemia of chronic disease in HIV patients on the combination of antiretroviral therapy.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Profile of Transgender Women With HIV: A US Health Care Database Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Article
- The impact of antiretroviral therapy on iron homeostasis and inflammation markers in HIV-infected patients with mild anemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnaemia has been linked with mortality in HIV infection. The mechanism of anaemia in the era of contemporary antiretroviral therapy is not understood. The aim of this study was to describe the association between anaemia and markers of immune activation and inflammation in a cohort of HIV-infected adults on stable antiretroviral therapy.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy with HIV-1 RNA<1,000 copies/ml. Soluble and cellular markers of inflammation and immune activation were measured. Relationships between haemoglobin levels, anaemia (haemoglobin <13 g/dl for men and <12 g/dl for women) and mild anaemia (haemoglobin <14 g/dl for men and <13 g/dl for women) and these markers were explored using multivariable linear regression.
resultsAmong the 147 participants, median age was 46 years, 78% were men, 68% were African American and 29% were Caucasian. Median body mass index (BMI) was 26.7 kg/m(2), nadir and current CD4(+) T-cell counts were 179 and 613 cells/mm(3), respectively, and 78% had HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml (range 20-600 copies/ml). Median (IQR) haemoglobin was 14.3 (13.1-15.1) g/dl; 14% were anaemic and 33% had at least mild anaemia. In multivariable analyses, mild anaemia was independently associated with female sex, older age, shorter duration of antiretroviral therapy, lower white blood cell count, higher platelet count, higher sCD14 and a greater number of CD14(dim)CD16(+) cells or 'patrolling' monocytes, which remained significant after further adjusting for race and BMI.
conclusionsHaving haemoglobin <14 g/dl for men and <13 g/dl for women was independently associated with monocyte activation (sCD14 and CD14(dim)CD16(+) cells) in HIV-infected adults on stable antiretroviral therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.