Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25667929›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Clinical outcome after the use of a new craniocaudal expandable implant for vertebral compression fracture treatment: one year results from a prospective multicentric study.

David Noriega, Antonio Krüger, Francisco Ardura, Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt, Frank Hassel, Xavier Barreau, Jörg Beyerlein

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David NoriegaSpine-Unit, University Hospital Valladolid, 47008 Valladolid, Spain.
Antonio KrügerDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Philipps University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Francisco ArduraSpine-Unit, University Hospital Valladolid, 47008 Valladolid, Spain.
Nils Hansen-AlgenstaedtDepartment of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Frank HasselDepartment of Spine Surgery, Loretto Clinic, 79100 Freiburg, Germany.
Xavier BarreauDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Jörg BeyerleinDepartment of Spine Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany ; Department of Spine Surgery, Bad Bramstedt Clinic, 24576 Bad Bramstedt, Germany.
Universidad de Valladolid · ESUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEHôpital Pellegrin · FRPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective multicentric observational study was to confirm the safety and clinical performance of a craniocaudal expandable implant used in combination with high viscosity PMMA bone cement for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Thirty-nine VCFs in 32 patients were treated using the SpineJack minimally invasive surgery protocol. Outcome was determined by using the Visual Analogue Scale for measuring pain, the Oswestry Disability Index for scoring functional capacity, and the self-reporting European Quality of Life scores for the quality of life. Safety was evaluated by reporting all adverse events. The occurrence of cement leakages was assessed by either radiographs or CT scan or both. Statistically significant improvements were found regarding pain, function, and quality of life. The global pain score reduction at 1 year was 80.9% compared to the preoperative situation and the result of the Oswestry Disability Index showed a decrease from 65.0% at baseline to 10.5% at 12 months postoperatively. The cement leakage rate was 30.8%. No device- or surgery-related complications were found. This observational study demonstrates promising and persistent results consisting of immediate and sustained pain relief and durable clinical improvement after the procedure and throughout the 1-year follow-up period.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAgedAged, 80 and overBone CementsFemaleFractures, CompressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeSpinal FracturesBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID25667929
PMCPMC4309217
OpenAlexW2091225562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.