ArticleCognition, technology & work (Online)2015
Standardisation and Its Discontents.
Article in Cognition, technology & work (Online), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicians' Perceptions of Information Quality and Access in a New Cross-Institutional Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Mixed Methods Design.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Strengthening governance in regional anaesthesia: balancing collective competence and risk management.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of the reimplementation of a standardised paediatric early warning system pilot in England.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- The Effect of Heterogeneous Definitions of Massive Transfusion on Using Blood Component Thresholds to Predict Futility in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- An Update on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Standardization.Cancers · 2025Review
- Exploring Physicians' Dual Perspectives on the Transition From Free Text to Structured and Standardized Documentation Practices: Interview and Participant Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Article
- Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in intensive care units.BMJ quality & safety · 2025Article
- Markers of Futile Resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Review of the Evidence and a Proposal for Futility Time-Outs during Massive Transfusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Adopting human factors in early phase and experimental medicine research: A nested pilot study observing controlled human infection with SARS-CoV-2.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Assessment of Standardized Care Plans for People with Chronic Diseases in Primary Care Settings.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Framework for standardizing digital health in resource-constrained settings: a case study of Uganda's digital health communication infrastructure.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Article
- The standardised Malay version of purdue pegboard test: Content validity and test-retest reliability testing.Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT · 2023Article
- Understanding the cultural environment of the outpatient care setting for patients with dementia receiving cancer treatment: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Role of the regulator in enabling a just culture: a qualitative study in mental health and hospital care.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The use of cognitive task analysis in clinical and health services research - a systematic review.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Review
- StarGazer: A Hybrid Intelligence Platform for Drug Target Prioritization and Digital Drug Repositioning Using Streamlit.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Safer Systems: People Training or System Tuning?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021Article
- Characterising and describing postpartum haemorrhage emergency kits in context: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In discussions of the quality and safety problems of modern, Western healthcare, one of the most frequently heard criticisms has been that: "It is not standardised." This paper explores issues around standardisation that illustrate its surprising complexity, its potential advantages and disadvantages, and its political and sociological implications, in the hope that discourses around standardisation might become more fruitful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.