ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2015
Adapting a drug screening platform to discover associations of molecular targeted radiosensitizers with genomic biomarkers.
Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Metabolism for Radiosensitization of KRAS Mutant 3D Lung Cancer Models.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- The Combination of PARP and Topoisomerase 1 Inhibitors Improves Radiation Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Human Intestinal Organoids and Microphysiological Systems for Modeling Radiotoxicity and Assessing Radioprotective Agents.Cancers · 2023Review
- A High Throughput Screen with a Clonogenic Endpoint to Identify Radiation Modulators of Cancer.Radiation research · 2023Article
- Boron-peptide conjugates with angiopep-2 for boron neutron capture therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Fluvastatin sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells toward radiation therapy and suppresses radiation- and/or TGF-β-induced tumor-associated fibrosis.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022Article
- Advances of Patient-Derived Organoids in Personalized Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- High-Content Clonogenic Survival Screen to Identify Chemoradiation Sensitizers.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- Moving Beyond the Standard of Care: Accelerate Testing of Radiation-Drug Combinations.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Clinical and Preclinical Outcomes of Combining Targeted Therapy With Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- National Cancer Institute (NCI) state of the science: Targeted radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer.Cancer · 2019Review
- Identification of anticancer drugs to radiosensitiseCancer biology & medicine · 2019Article
- A common Chk1-dependent phenotype of DNA double-strand break suppression in two distinct radioresistant cancer types.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledLarge collections of annotated cancer cell lines are powerful tools for precisely matching targeted drugs with genomic alterations that can be tested as biomarkers in the clinic. Whether these screening platforms, which utilize short-term cell survival to assess drug responses, can be applied to precision radiation medicine is not established. To this end, 32 cancer cell lines were screened using 18 targeted therapeutic agents with known or putative radiosensitizing properties (227 combinations). The cell number remaining after drug exposure with or without radiation was assessed by nonclonogenic assays. We derived short-term radiosensitization factors (SRF2Gy) and calculated clonogenic survival assay-based dose enhancement factors (DEFSF0.1). Radiosensitization was characterized by SRF2Gy values of mostly ∼1.05 to 1.2 and significantly correlated with drug-induced changes in apoptosis and senescence frequencies. SRF2Gy was significantly correlated with DEFSF0.1, with a respective sensitivity and specificity of 91.7% and 81.5% for a 3-day endpoint, and 82.8% and 84.2% for a robotic 5-day assay. KRAS mutations (codons 12/13) were found to be a biomarker of radiosensitization by midostaurin in lung cancer, which was pronounced under conditions that enriched for stem cell-like cells. In conclusion, although short-term proliferation/survival assays cannot replace the gold-standard clonogenic survival assay for measuring cellular radiosensitivity, they capture with high accuracy the relative change in radiosensitivity that is caused by a radiosensitzing targeted agent. IMPLICATIONS: This study supports a paradigm shift regarding the utility of short-term assays for precision radiation medicine, which should facilitate the identification of genomic biomarkers to guide the testing of novel drug/radiation combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.