Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25666851›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2015

Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in pet cats in Norway and risk factors for seropositivity.

Bente Kristin Sævik, Randi Ingebjørg Krontveit, Kristine P Eggen, Nina Malmberg, Stein I Thoresen, Kristin W Prestrud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and risk factors of cats in the Budapest area.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Seroprevalence of and Risk Factors forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bente Kristin SævikNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway bente.saevik@nmbu.no.
Randi Ingebjørg KrontveitNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine P EggenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway.
Nina MalmbergNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway.
Stein I ThoresenNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin W PrestrudNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Oslo, Norway Norwegian Kennel Club, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aims of the study were to estimate Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in pet cats in Norway and to evaluate risk factors for seropositivity. Additionally, serum biochemistry and haematological variables for T gondii seropositive and seronegative cats were compared.

methodsA convenience sample of surplus sera submitted to the Central Laboratory, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, was collected. The samples were from healthy cats and cats with a variety of diseases. Analyses for IgG antibodies to T gondii were performed with a commercial direct agglutination test, with 1:40 as the threshold value. For risk factor analysis a logistic regression model of the relationship between predictors and the outcome was applied.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-six of 478 cats were seropositive for T gondii, and the estimated seroprevalence in the study sample was 41.0% (95% confidence interval 36.6-45.4). Compared with domestic cats, pedigree cats had reduced risk for Toxoplasma seropositivity (odds ratio [OR] 0.42). Males had increased risk (OR 1.63) compared with females. The effect of age was highly significant, and an increase in the cats' age across the interquartile range (IQR; 52-160 months/4-13 years of age) doubled the risk of Toxoplasma seropositivity (OR 2.11). The risk for Toxoplasma seropositivity among cats living in Oslo was significantly reduced (OR 0.51) when compared with the rest of Norway. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pet cats in Norway appear to be commonly exposed to T gondii. Signalment and geographical region influenced the odds of Toxoplasma seropositivity, whereas health status did not.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanCat DiseasesCatsFemaleMaleNorwayRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID25666851
PMCPMC10816337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.