ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2015
Oral bioavailability: issues and solutions via nanoformulations.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bile acid triggered release of daunorubicin from silica nanoparticle-stabilized antibubbles.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Insights into Dihydromyricetin: Redox Modulation and Kinase-Mediated Control of Disease Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pluronic F-127/Propylene Glycol Binary Building Blocks for Novel Solid Dispersion Matrix: Industrial and Ecological Paradigm to Enhance Dissolution Profile of Dapagliflozin.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology-Driven Therapeutic Potential of Raloxifene in Osteoporosis and Cancer: A Recent Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Targeting NLRP3 inflammasome with curcumin: mechanisms and therapeutic promise in chronic inflammation.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- Enhancement of cannabidiol oral bioavailability through the development of nanostructured lipid carriers: In vitro and in vivo evaluation studies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Article
- Development of Bioresponsive Poloxamer-Based Self-Nanoemulsifying System for Enhanced Febuxostat Bioavailability: Solidification Strategy Using I-Optimal Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Advanced hybrid computational analysis of febuxostat solubility using machine learning in supercritical processing method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Potential of Nano-Formulated Natural Drugs in Melanoma Treatment: A Review of Pharmacological Efficacy and Mechanistic Insights.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Harnessing nutrients and natural products for sustainable drug development against aging.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Optimization of Glibenclamide Loaded Thermoresponsive SNEDDS Using Design of Experiment Approach: Paving the Way to Enhance Pharmaceutical Applicability.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unlocking the Potential of Camel Milk-Derived Exosomes as Novel Delivery Systems: Enhanced Bioavailability of ARV-825 PROTAC for Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- From desert flora to cancer therapy: systematic exploration of multi-pathway mechanisms using network pharmacology and molecular modeling approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Lipid Horizons: Recent Advances and Future Prospects in LBDDS for Oral Administration of Antihypertensive Agents.International journal of hypertension · 2024Review
- Development of a Multifunctional Oral Dosage Form via Integration of Solid Dispersion Technology with a Black Seed Oil-Based Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Article
- Lipid-Based Nanocarriers in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM): Challenges and Opportunities.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- The Flavonoid Components ofCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry · 2023Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Delivery Systems for Vaccines.Vaccines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The delivery of drugs through the oral route is regarded as most optimal to achieve desired therapeutic effects and patient compliance. However, poor pharmacokinetic profiles of oral drug candidates remains an area of concern, and approaches to enhance their bioavailability are widely cited in the literature. Traditionally, the approaches have been confined to molecular optimization of the drug molecule, which has gradually evolved into development of microsized and nanosized formulations. Nanoformulations, by virtue of their nanosize, are widely acclaimed for circumventing the obstacles of poor pharmacokinetics. In this review, an attempt has been made to discuss existing challenges of bioavailability and approaches to overcome the same, with in-depth compilation of the literature on nanoformulations. The nanoformulations reviewed include nanocrystals, nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, polymeric micelles and lipid nanocarriers. This review confirms the potential of nanomedicines to improve the pharmacokinetics of drugs via nanoformulations. Chemotherapeutic applications and patent reports are also compiled in the review. Despite the promising benefits, nanomedicines are associated with hazards to human health. Hence, the review also deals with toxicological consequences of nanomedicines, and with in vitro/in vivo screening methods to assess bioavailability as per regulatory considerations. Nanotechnology has been shown to facilitate the clinical translation of drug candidates that were deemed to be bioavailability failures. Conclusively, nanotechnological approaches to particle design and formulation are beginning to expand the market for many drugs with improved bioavailability and therapeutics. However, dedicated efforts are needed to develop advanced nanomedicines with minimal or no adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25666353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.