Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25666151›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy evaluation in empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Kristina Öbrink-Hansen, Tore Forsingdal Hardlei, Birgitte Brock, Søren Jensen-Fangel, Marianne Kragh Thomsen, Eskild Petersen, Mads Kreilgaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01983839 (Moxifloxacin Pharmacokinetic Profile and Efficacy Evaluation in the Empiric Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01983839 completednot on this map

Moxifloxacin Pharmacokinetic Profile and Efficacy Evaluation in the Empiric Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2013 to 2014Enrolled18ConditionsPneumonia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic Resistance ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina Öbrink-HansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark krisoebr@rm.dk.
Tore Forsingdal HardleiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Birgitte BrockDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Søren Jensen-FangelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Marianne Kragh ThomsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Eskild PetersenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Mads KreilgaardDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When antimicrobials are used empirically, pathogen MICs equal to clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values must be considered. This is to ensure that the most resistant pathogen subpopulation is appropriately targeted to prevent emergence of resistance. Accordingly, we determined the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of moxifloxacin at 400 mg/day in 18 patients treated empirically for community-acquired pneumonia. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model to assess the potential efficacy of moxifloxacin and to simulate the maximal MICs for which recommended pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) estimates are obtained. Moxifloxacin plasma concentrations were determined the day after therapy initiation using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak drug concentrations (Cmax) and area under the free drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (fAUC0-24) values predicted for each patient were evaluated against epidemiological cutoff MIC values for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Legionella pneumophila. PK-PD targets adopted were a Cmax/MIC of ≥12.2 for all pathogens, an fAUC0-24/MIC of >34 for S. pneumoniae, and an fAUC0-24/MIC of >75 for H. influenzae and L. pneumophila. Individual predicted estimates for Cmax/MIC and fAUC0-24/MIC as well as simulated maximal MICs resulting in target attainment for oral and intravenous administration of the drug were suitable for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae but not for L. pneumophila. These results indicate that caution must be taken when moxifloxacin is used as monotherapy to treat community-acquired pneumonia caused by L. pneumophila. In conclusion, this report reveals key information relevant to the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia while highlighting the robust and flexible nature of this population pharmacokinetic model to predict therapeutic success. (Clinical Trials Registration no. NCT01983839.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCommunity-Acquired InfectionsComputer SimulationFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacin

Identifiers

PMID25666151
PMCPMC4356773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.