ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2015
Design control for clinical translation of 3D printed modular scaffolds.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Approach for Tetralogy of Fallot-Absent Pulmonary Valve Using Bioresorbable Airway Splints.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Tracheo/Bronchomalacia in Children: The Italian Multicenter Experience.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Investigation of the biodegradation kinetics and associated mechanical properties of 3D-printed polycaprolactone during long-term preclinical testing.Biomaterials · 2025Article
- Fully Defined 3D Hybrid System for Bone Tissue Engineering: Integration of MeHA-RGD/PCL-TCP Scaffolds With Human Stem Cells via 3D-Printed Vacuum-Assisted Cell Loading Device.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Characterization of Heparin-Containing Hydrogel/3D-Printed Scaffold Composites for Craniofacial Reconstruction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Physical stimuli-emitting scaffolds: The role of piezoelectricity in tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Bioengineering and Clinical Translation of Human Lung and its Components.Advanced biology · 2023Review
- Advantages of FDM and gamma irradiation to manufacture personalized medical devices for airway obstructions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Point-of-care treatment of geometrically complex midfacial critical-sized bone defects with 3D-Printed scaffolds and autologous stromal vascular fraction.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Evaluating Directional Dependency of Selective Laser Sintered Patient Specific Biodegradable Devices to Improve Predictive Modeling and Design Verification.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications.Polymers · 2021Review
- Advances in Biodegradable 3D Printed Scaffolds with Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Fabrication andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Development of 18 Quality Control Gates for Additive Manufacturing of Error Free Patient-Specific Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- 3D-printed, externally-implanted, bioresorbable airway splints for severe tracheobronchomalacia.The Laryngoscope · 2019Article
- Integrated Design Approaches for 3D Printed Tissue Scaffolds: Review and Outlook.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Permeability versus Design in TPMS Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- 3D-bioprinted tracheal reconstruction: an overview.Bioelectronic medicine · 2019Review
- The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies.Birth defects research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The primary thrust of tissue engineering is the clinical translation of scaffolds and/or biologics to reconstruct tissue defects. Despite this thrust, clinical translation of tissue engineering therapies from academic research has been minimal in the 27 year history of tissue engineering. Academic research by its nature focuses on, and rewards, initial discovery of new phenomena and technologies in the basic research model, with a view towards generality. Translation, however, by its nature must be directed at specific clinical targets, also denoted as indications, with associated regulatory requirements. These regulatory requirements, especially design control, require that the clinical indication be precisely defined a priori, unlike most academic basic tissue engineering research where the research target is typically open-ended, and furthermore requires that the tissue engineering therapy be constructed according to design inputs that ensure it treats or mitigates the clinical indication. Finally, regulatory approval dictates that the constructed system be verified, i.e., proven that it meets the design inputs, and validated, i.e., that by meeting the design inputs the therapy will address the clinical indication. Satisfying design control requires (1) a system of integrated technologies (scaffolds, materials, biologics), ideally based on a fundamental platform, as compared to focus on a single technology, (2) testing of design hypotheses to validate system performance as opposed to mechanistic hypotheses of natural phenomena, and (3) sequential testing using in vitro, in vivo, large preclinical and eventually clinical tests against competing therapies, as compared to single experiments to test new technologies or test mechanistic hypotheses. Our goal in this paper is to illustrate how design control may be implemented in academic translation of scaffold based tissue engineering therapies. Specifically, we propose to (1) demonstrate a modular platform approach founded on 3D printing for developing tissue engineering therapies and (2) illustrate the design control process for modular implementation of two scaffold based tissue engineering therapies: airway reconstruction and bone tissue engineering based spine fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.