Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25666115›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2015

Design control for clinical translation of 3D printed modular scaffolds.

Scott J Hollister, Colleen L Flanagan, David A Zopf, Robert J Morrison, Hassan Nasser, Janki J Patel, Edward Ebramzadeh, Sophia N Sangiorgio, Matthew B Wheeler, Glenn E Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Fabrication andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Permeability versus Design in TPMS Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Scott J HollisterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Rm 2214 Lurie Biomedical Engineering Bldg, 1101 Beal Ave, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, scottho@umich.edu.
Colleen L Flanagan
David A Zopf
Robert J Morrison
Hassan Nasser
Janki J Patel
Edward Ebramzadeh
Sophia N Sangiorgio
Matthew B Wheeler
Glenn E Green
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USOrthopaedic Institute for Children · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Advanced Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC005356 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CORFAS, GABRIEL · 2002 to 2021
$3.5M
Protein-Releasing Microporous Scaffolds for Cell Replacement TherapyR01EB009910 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUO, XUNRONG, SHEA, LONNIE D · 2010 to 2018
$3.5M
Integrated Structural BMP2 Carrier Systems for Cervical Spine Fusion (resubmissiR01AR060892 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHEA, LONNIE D · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
A Bioresorbable Splint for Treating TracheomalaciaR21HD076370 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GREEN, GLENN E, HOLLISTER, SCOTT J · 2013 to 2014
$440k
Custom Designed Pre-Fabricated Bone Flaps for Mandibular ReconstructionR21DE022439 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EDWARDS, SEAN PETER, HOLLISTER, SCOTT J · 2012 to 2013
$437k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR 060892NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060892NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009910NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD076370NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005356NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE022439NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE0224439NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary thrust of tissue engineering is the clinical translation of scaffolds and/or biologics to reconstruct tissue defects. Despite this thrust, clinical translation of tissue engineering therapies from academic research has been minimal in the 27 year history of tissue engineering. Academic research by its nature focuses on, and rewards, initial discovery of new phenomena and technologies in the basic research model, with a view towards generality. Translation, however, by its nature must be directed at specific clinical targets, also denoted as indications, with associated regulatory requirements. These regulatory requirements, especially design control, require that the clinical indication be precisely defined a priori, unlike most academic basic tissue engineering research where the research target is typically open-ended, and furthermore requires that the tissue engineering therapy be constructed according to design inputs that ensure it treats or mitigates the clinical indication. Finally, regulatory approval dictates that the constructed system be verified, i.e., proven that it meets the design inputs, and validated, i.e., that by meeting the design inputs the therapy will address the clinical indication. Satisfying design control requires (1) a system of integrated technologies (scaffolds, materials, biologics), ideally based on a fundamental platform, as compared to focus on a single technology, (2) testing of design hypotheses to validate system performance as opposed to mechanistic hypotheses of natural phenomena, and (3) sequential testing using in vitro, in vivo, large preclinical and eventually clinical tests against competing therapies, as compared to single experiments to test new technologies or test mechanistic hypotheses. Our goal in this paper is to illustrate how design control may be implemented in academic translation of scaffold based tissue engineering therapies. Specifically, we propose to (1) demonstrate a modular platform approach founded on 3D printing for developing tissue engineering therapies and (2) illustrate the design control process for modular implementation of two scaffold based tissue engineering therapies: airway reconstruction and bone tissue engineering based spine fusion.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsBronchiCervical VertebraeHumansSplintsTissue EngineeringTrachea

Identifiers

PMID25666115
PMCPMC4407657
OpenAlexW1994647433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.