Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25666113›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2015

Probiotic potential of lactobacillus strains isolated from sorghum-based traditional fermented food.

K Poornachandra Rao, G Chennappa, U Suraj, H Nagaraja, A P Charith Raj, M Y Sreenivasa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing probiotic properties of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ABO1 strain isolated from toddy palm nectar.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of synbiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria: Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus faecalis.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Isolation andFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Unveiling the Perspective onMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the safety and efficacy ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. ESKAPEE Pathogen Biofilm Control on Surfaces with ProbioticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Antifungal activity of probiotic strainFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Impacts ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. First report on the probiotic potential ofBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2022
    Article
  19. Probiotic properties ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K Poornachandra RaoDepartment of Studies in Microbiology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore, 570 006, Karnataka, India, pckrao.06@gmail.com.
G Chennappa
U Suraj
H Nagaraja
A P Charith Raj
M Y Sreenivasa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorghum-based traditional fermented food was screened for potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria. The isolates were identified by biochemical, physiological and genetic methods. Species identification was done by 16s rRNA sequence analysis. The functional probiotic potential of the two Lactobacillus species viz., Lactobacillus plantarum (Lact. plantarum) and Lactobacillus pentosus (Lact. pentosus) was assessed by different standard parameters. The strains were tolerant to pH 2 for 1 h and resistant to methicillin, kanamycin, vancomycin and norfloxacin. Two (Lact. plantarum COORG-3 and Lact. pentosus COORG-8) out of eight isolates recorded the cell surface hydrophobicity to be 59.12 and 64.06%, respectively. All the strains showed tolerance to artificial duodenum juice (pH 2) for 3 h, positive for bile salt hydrolase test and negative for haemolytic test. The neutralized cell-free supernatant of the strains Lact. pentosus COORG-4, Lact. plantarum COORG-1, Lact. plantarum COORG-7, Lact. pentosus COORG-8 and Lact. plantarum COORG-3 showed good antibiofilm activity. Lact. pentosus COORG-8 exhibited 74% activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa-MTCC 7903 and Lact. plantarum COORG-7 showed 68% inhibition of biofilm against Klebsiella pneumonia MTCC 7407. Three (Lact. plantarum COORG-7, Lact. pentosus COORG-5 and Lact. pentosus COORG 8) out of eight isolates exhibited a good antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes and five isolates (Lact. pentosus COORG 2, Lact. plantarum COORG 1, Lact. plantarum COORG 4, Lact. pentosus COORG 3 and Lact. plantarum COORG 6) are active against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumonia, Enterococcus faecalis. The study also evaluated the cholesterol lowering property of the Lactobacillus strains using hen egg yolk as the cholesterol source. The cholesterol in hen egg yolk was assimilated by 74.12 and 68.26% by Lact. plantarum COORG 4 and Lact. pentosus COORG 7, respectively. The results of the present study suggest that the Lactobacillus strains isolated and characterized from sorghum-based fermented product may be used as probiotic strains for therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus subtilisCholesterolDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEgg YolkEnterobacter aerogenesEnterococcus faecalisEscherichia coliFermentationFood MicrobiologyHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeLactiplantibacillus plantarumAnti-Bacterial AgentsCholesterolDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.