Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25665963›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

3D structure tensor analysis of light microscopy data for validating diffusion MRI.

Ahmad Raza Khan, Anda Cornea, Lindsey A Leigland, Steven G Kohama, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen, Christopher D Kroenke

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diffusion MRI of the Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad Raza KhanDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA; Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anda CorneaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.
Lindsey A LeiglandAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Steven G KohamaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.
Sune Nørhøj JespersenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christopher D KroenkeDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA; Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA.
Oregon National Primate Research Center · USAarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKAdvanced Imaging Research (United States) · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Ultrastructure and Single Particle Microscopy CoreP30NS061800 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI AICHER, SUE A · 2009 to 2020
$6.6M
Characterizing the FASD cerebral cortex in utero with DTIR01AA021981 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KROENKE, CHRISTOPHER D · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Structural determinants of DTI observations in developing cortex and white matterR01NS070022 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KROENKE, CHRISTOPHER D · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
Tim Upgrade for Nonhuman-Primate-Dedicated Magnetom TrioS10RR027238 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KROENKE, CHRISTOPHER D · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027238NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021981NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA021981NIH HHS P51 OD011092NIH HHS P51OD011092NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS061800NINDS NIH HHS P30NS061800NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070022NINDS NIH HHS R01NS070022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (d-MRI) is a powerful non-invasive and non-destructive technique for characterizing brain tissue on the microscopic scale. However, the lack of validation of d-MRI by independent experimental means poses an obstacle to accurate interpretation of data acquired using this method. Recently, structure tensor analysis has been applied to light microscopy images, and this technique holds promise to be a powerful validation strategy for d-MRI. Advantages of this approach include its similarity to d-MRI in terms of averaging the effects of a large number of cellular structures, and its simplicity, which enables it to be implemented in a high-throughput manner. However, a drawback of previous implementations of this technique arises from it being restricted to 2D. As a result, structure tensor analyses have been limited to tissue sectioned in a direction orthogonal to the direction of interest. Here we describe the analytical framework for extending structure tensor analysis to 3D, and utilize the results to analyze serial image "stacks" acquired with confocal microscopy of rhesus macaque hippocampal tissue. Implementation of 3D structure tensor procedures requires removal of sources of anisotropy introduced in tissue preparation and confocal imaging. This is accomplished with image processing steps to mitigate the effects of anisotropic tissue shrinkage, and the effects of anisotropy in the point spread function (PSF). In order to address the latter confound, we describe procedures for measuring the dependence of PSF anisotropy on distance from the microscope objective within tissue. Prior to microscopy, ex vivo d-MRI measurements performed on the hippocampal tissue revealed three regions of tissue with mutually orthogonal directions of least restricted diffusion that correspond to CA1, alveus and inferior longitudinal fasciculus. We demonstrate the ability of 3D structure tensor analysis to identify structure tensor orientations that are parallel to d-MRI derived diffusion tensors in each of these three regions. It is concluded that the 3D generalization of structure tensor analysis will further improve the utility of this method for validation of d-MRI by making it a more flexible experimental technique that closer resembles the inherently 3D nature of d-MRI measurements.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHippocampusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacaca mulattaMicroscopy, ConfocalAnisotropyDiffusionHippocampusStructure tensor

Identifiers

PMID25665963
PMCPMC4387076
OpenAlexW2038003836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.