Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25665791›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2015

Occult macular dystrophy.

Yozo Miyake, Kazushige Tsunoda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Persistent diffuse photoreceptor disorganization: further evidence with potential associations, long-term clinical course and therapeutic responsiveness of a new clinical entity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New recessive compound heterozygous variants ofInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Utility ofAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yozo MiyakeAichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Kazushige Tsunoda
Aichi Medical University · JPTokyo Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occult macular dystrophy (OMD) was first reported in 1989 as a hereditary macular disease without visible fundus abnormalities. Patients with OMD are characterized by a progressive decrease of visual acuity but have normal fundus and fluorescein angiograms with both the rod and cone components of the full-field electroretinograms (ERGs) essentially normal. However, the focal macular ERGs and multifocal ERGs are severely attenuated. These findings indicate that the retinal dysfunction is confined to the macula. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has shown structural changes in the outer nuclear and/or photoreceptor layers. Genetic analyses of OMD pedigrees have identified dominant mutations in the RP1L1 gene. However, the same mutations were not detected in sporadic cases, suggesting that several independent mutations can lead to the OMD phenotype. The purpose of this paper is to review the history of OMD, the visual functions determined psychophysically, ERG findings, OCT characteristics and genetic findings in patients with OMD.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyEye ProteinsFluorescein AngiographyHumansMacular DegenerationMutationPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateTomography, Optical CoherenceVision DisordersVisual AcuityEye ProteinsRP1L1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25665791
OpenAlexW2159653655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.