Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25665700›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Evaluation of an electronic health record-supported obesity management protocol implemented in a community health center: a cautionary note.

Jeremy Steglitz, Deborah Edberg, Mary Sommers, Mary R Talen, Louise K Thornton, Bonnie Spring

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What works and why in the identification and referral of adults with comorbid obesity in primary care: A realist review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Review
  4. Toward a health-promoting system for cancer survivors: Patient and provider multiple behavior change.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremy SteglitzDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60611, USA jeremy.steglitz@northwestern.edu.
Deborah Edberg
Mary SommersErie Family Health Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary R TalenErie Family Health Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Louise K ThorntonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Priority Research Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Bonnie SpringDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
TRAINING U54EB020404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KUMAR, SANTOSH · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrimary care clinicians are well-positioned to intervene in the obesity epidemic. We studied whether implementation of an obesity intake protocol and electronic health record (EHR) form to guide behavior modification would facilitate identification and management of adult obesity in a Federally Qualified Health Center serving low-income, Hispanic patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn three studies, we examined clinician and patient outcomes before and after the addition of the weight management protocol and form. In the Clinician Study, 12 clinicians self-reported obesity management practices. In the Population Study, BMI and order data from 5000 patients and all 40 clinicians in the practice were extracted from the EHR preintervention and postintervention. In the Exposure Study, EHR-documented outcomes for a sub-sample of 46 patients actually exposed to the obesity management form were compared to matched controls.

resultsClinicians reported that the intake protocol and form increased their performance of obesity-related assessments and their confidence in managing obesity. However, no improvement in obesity management practices or patient weight-loss was evident in EHR records for the overall clinic population. Further analysis revealed that only 55 patients were exposed to the form. Exposed patients were twice as likely to receive weight-loss counseling following the intervention, as compared to before, and more likely than matched controls. However, their obesity outcomes did not differ.

conclusionResults suggest that an obesity intake protocol and EHR-based weight management form may facilitate clinician weight-loss counseling among those exposed to the form. Significant implementation barriers can limit exposure, however, and need to be addressed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsAdultBody Mass IndexClinical CompetenceCommunity Health CentersCounselingFemaleHumansMaleNurse PractitionersObesityPhysiciansPrimary Health CareWeight Losscommunity healthelectronic health recordevidence-based practiceobesityprimary care

Identifiers

PMID25665700
PMCPMC5009897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.