Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25665678›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2015

Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation.

Rachel Rosenthal, Henry Hoffmann, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Heiner C Bucher, Salome Dell-Kuster

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04124757 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Deep Versus Standard Muscle Relaxation on Intra-operative Safety During Laparoscopic Surgery: a Multicenter Strategy Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled731ConditionsNeuromuscular Blockade, Rocuronium, Anesthetics, Anesthesia ComplicationArmsDeep neuromuscular block
NCT04994392 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Intra-Operative Complication Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards: Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, and Nurses Survey

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled4,821ConditionsIntraoperative Complications, Surgery--Complications, Surgery, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How safe is teaching of highly specialized rectal surgery? A propensity score-matched 10-year cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel RosenthalDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland, rachel.rosenthal@unibas.ch.
Henry Hoffmann
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Heiner C Bucher
Salome Dell-Kuster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandardized reporting of intraoperative adverse events is important to enhance transparency. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated definition and classification of intraoperative complications.

methodsWe conducted a two-round Delphi study to develop a definition and classification of intraoperative complications. Experts were contacted by email and sent a link to the online questionnaire. In a pilot study, two independent raters applied the definition and classification in a sample of 60 surgical interventions of low, intermediate, and high complexity and evaluated practicability. Interrater agreement of the classification was determined (raw categorical agreement, weighted kappa, and intraclass correlation).

resultsIn the Delphi study, 40 of 52 experts (77 % return rate) from 14 countries took part in each round. The Delphi study resulted in a comprehensive definition of intraoperative complications as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course occurring between skin incision and skin closure. The classification foresees four grades depending on the need for treatment (no need, grade I; need for treatment, grade II) and the severity of the complication (life-threatening/permanent disability, grade III; death, grade IV). The pilot study showed good practicability (6 on a 7-point scale) and a high raw agreement of 87 %, a weighted kappa of 0.83 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.94] and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.73-0.90).

conclusionsWhile the Delphi process enabled to develop definitions and classification of intraoperative complications by severity, further research including a multicentre international full-scale validation needs to be conducted with the ultimate goal to contribute to standardized reporting in surgical practice and research.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.