ArticleGenome research2015
Accurate, multi-kb reads resolve complex populations and detect rare microorganisms.
Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling Global Diversity of Patescibacteriota and Functional Interactions with Host Microbes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Reduced methane emissions in transgenic rice genotypes are associated with altered rhizosphere microbial hydrogen cycling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Microbial diversity and community shifts in a petroleum reservoir under production: effects of water breakthrough and anthropogenic alterations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Complex compositional and metabolic response of river sediment microbiomes to multiple anthropogenic stressors.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Comparison of short-read and long-read metagenome assemblies in a natural soil community highlights systematic bias in recovery of high-diversity populations.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- De novo peptide databases enable protein-based stable isotope probing of microbial communities with up to species-level resolution.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Quantifying the contribution of the rare biosphere to natural disturbances.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequencing, characterization and analysis of coronene degrading bacterial strain Halomonas elongata.PloS one · 2025Article
- Geochemical variability and microbial metabolic functions in oligotrophic sediments exposed to minor seepage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Impact of sample multiplexing on detection of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes in pig microbiomes using long-read sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Closing the genome of unculturable cable bacteria using a combined metagenomic assembly of long and short sequencing reads.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Life strategies for Aminicenantia in subseafloor oceanic crust.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Impacts of Binary Oxide Nanoparticles on the Soybean Plant and Its Rhizosphere, Associated Phytohormones, and Enzymes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Seasonal microbial dynamics in the ocean inferred from assembled and unassembled data: a view on the unknown biosphere.ISME communications · 2022Article
- Oxford Nanopore R10.4 long-read sequencing enables the generation of near-finished bacterial genomes from pure cultures and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Metagenomic Analysis Using Phylogenetic Placement-A Review of the First Decade.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Stable-Isotope-Informed, Genome-Resolved Metagenomics Uncovers Potential Cross-Kingdom Interactions in Rhizosphere Soil.mSphere · 2021Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate evaluation of microbial communities is essential for understanding global biogeochemical processes and can guide bioremediation and medical treatments. Metagenomics is most commonly used to analyze microbial diversity and metabolic potential, but assemblies of the short reads generated by current sequencing platforms may fail to recover heterogeneous strain populations and rare organisms. Here we used short (150-bp) and long (multi-kb) synthetic reads to evaluate strain heterogeneity and study microorganisms at low abundance in complex microbial communities from terrestrial sediments. The long-read data revealed multiple (probably dozens of) closely related species and strains from previously undescribed Deltaproteobacteria and Aminicenantes (candidate phylum OP8). Notably, these are the most abundant organisms in the communities, yet short-read assemblies achieved only partial genome coverage, mostly in the form of short scaffolds (N50 = ∼ 2200 bp). Genome architecture and metabolic potential for these lineages were reconstructed using a new synteny-based method. Analysis of long-read data also revealed thousands of species whose abundances were <0.1% in all samples. Most of the organisms in this "long tail" of rare organisms belong to phyla that are also represented by abundant organisms. Genes encoding glycosyl hydrolases are significantly more abundant than expected in rare genomes, suggesting that rare species may augment the capability for carbon turnover and confer resilience to changing environmental conditions. Overall, the study showed that a diversity of closely related strains and rare organisms account for a major portion of the communities. These are probably common features of many microbial communities and can be effectively studied using a combination of long and short reads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.