Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2015
Clinical impact of immunophenotypic remission after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes in newly diagnosed young or high-risk myeloma patients receiving tandem autologous/allogeneic transplant followed by bortezomib maintenance: a phase II study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Trial
- Long-term follow up of tandem autologous-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.Haematologica · 2019Article
- Phase I study of cord blood-derived natural killer cells combined with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2017Article
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma: When and in Whom Does It Work.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunophenotypic remission (IR) is a strong prognostic factor in myeloma patients. The combination of IR and conventional CR was retrospectively evaluated in 66 patients after allografting. IR was defined as the absence of monoclonal plasma cells in BM aspirates by multiparameter flow cytometry. Conditioning was non-myeloablative in 55 patients; reduced-intensity in 10 and myeloablative in 1 patient. The allograft was given upfront in 35/66 (53%) patients. After a median follow-up of 7.1 years, 24 patients achieved both CR and IR (CR/IR group), 21 achieved IR but not CR with persistence of a urine/serum M-component (no CR/IR group) and 21 did not achieve either CR or IR (no CR/no IR group). Median OS and EFS were 'not reached' and 59 months in the CR/IR group; 64 and 16 months in the no CR/IR; and 36 and 6 months in the no CR/no IR, respectively (P<0.001). Cumulative incidence of extramedullary disease was 4.4% in the CR/IR, 38.1% in the no CR/IR and 14.3% in the no CR/no IR groups, respectively, at 4 years (P<0.001). IR was a valid tool to monitor residual disease after allografting, and allowed definition of a cohort of patients at higher incidence of extramedullary relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.