Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664976›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2015

A novel strategy of radiofrequency hyperthermia (neothermia) in combination with preoperative chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of advanced rectal cancer: a pilot study.

Hisanori Shoji, Masahiko Motegi, Kiyotaka Osawa, Noriyuki Okonogi, Atsushi Okazaki, Yoshitaka Andou, Takayuki Asao, Hiroyuki Kuwano, Takeo Takahashi, Kyoji Ogoshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hisanori ShojiDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Masahiko MotegiDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Kiyotaka OsawaDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Noriyuki OkonogiDivision of Radiology, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Atsushi OkazakiDivision of Radiology, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Yoshitaka AndouDivision of Surgery, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Takayuki AsaoDepartment of Oncology Clinical Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan.
Hiroyuki KuwanoDepartment of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan.
Takeo TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Kyoji OgoshiDivision of Cancer Diagnosis and Cancer Treatment, Hidaka Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Hidaka Hospital · JPGunma University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of weekly regional hyperthermia performed with 8 MHz radiofrequency (RF) capacitive heating equipment has been established in rectal cancer. We aimed to standardize hyperthermia treatment for scientific evaluation and for assessing local tumor response to RF hyperthermia in rectal cancer. Forty-nine patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the study. All patients received chemoradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy 5 days/week (dose, 50 Gy/25 times) concomitant with 5 days/week for five times of capecitabine (1700 mg/m(2) per day) and once a week for five times of 50 min irradiations by an 8 MHz RF capacitive heating device. Thirty-three patients underwent surgery 8 weeks after treatment. Three patients did not undergo surgery because of progressive disease (PD) and 13 refused. Eight (16.3%) patients had a pathological complete response (ypCR) after surgery. Among patients without surgery, 3 (6.1%) had clinical complete response (CR) and 3 (6.1%) had local CR but distant PD (CRPD). Ninety percent of ypCR + CR patients were shown in 6.21 W min(-1) m(-2) /treatment or higher group of average total accumulated irradiation output with 429°C min(-1) m(-2) or higher group of total accumulated thermal output. However, a patient with CRPD was in the higher total accumulated thermal output group. We propose a new quantitative parameter for the hyperthermia and demonstrated that patients can benefit from mild irradiation with mild temperature. Using these parameters, the exact output, optimal thermal treatment, and contraindications or indications of this modality could be determined in a multi-institutional, future study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody TemperatureCatheter AblationChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPilot ProjectsPreoperative CareRectal Neoplasms8 MHz radiofrequency capacitive heating devicecapecitabinehyperthermiaintensity-modulated radiotherapyrectal cancerreference point

Identifiers

PMID25664976
PMCPMC4472206
OpenAlexW1969539968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.