Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664968›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015

Incidence of sexually transmitted infections after human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent females.

Anupam B Jena, Dana P Goldman, Seth A Seabury

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anupam B JenaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dana P GoldmanNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts4Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Seth A SeaburyLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles5Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
University of Southern California · USNational Bureau of Economic Research · US

Funding

AN ECONOMIC AND BEHAVIORAL EVALUATION OF MEDICARE PART DP01AG033559 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDMAN, DANA P · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Physician Determinants of Health Care Spending, Quality, and Patient OutcomesDP5OD017897 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JENA, ANUPAM BAPU · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS 5P01AG033559NIA NIH HHS P01 AG033559NIH HHS 1DP5OD017897-01NIH HHS DP5 OD017897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates among US females remain low, in part because of concerns that HPV vaccination may promote unsafe sexual activity by lowering perceived risks of acquiring a sexually transmitted infection (STI).

objectiveTo study whether HPV vaccination of females is associated with increases in STI rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsUsing a large, longitudinal insurance database of females aged 12 to 18 years insured from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2010, in the United States, we examined whether HPV vaccination was associated with an increase in incident STIs among females who were vaccinated compared with those who were not. We defined STIs as one or more medical claims for any of the following infections in a given quarter: chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, human immunodeficiency virus or AIDS, or syphilis. We used difference-in-difference analysis to compare changes in STI rates among HPV-vaccinated females before and after vaccination (index quarter) to changes among age-matched nonvaccinated females before and after the index quarter. We analyzed whether effects varied according to age and prior contraceptive medication use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of STIs.

resultsThe rates of STIs in the year before vaccination were higher among HPV-vaccinated females (94 of 21 610, 4.3 per 1000) compared with age-matched nonvaccinated females (522 of 186 501, 2.8 per 1000) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.09-1.71; P = .007). The rates of STIs increased for the vaccinated (147 of 21 610, 6.8 per 1000) and nonvaccinated (781 of 186 501, 4.2 per 1000) groups in the year after vaccination (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.25-1.79; P < .001). The difference-in-difference odds ratio was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.80-1.38; P = .74), implying that HPV vaccination was not associated with an increase in STIs relative to growth among nonvaccinated females. Similar associations held among subgroups aged 12 through 14 years and aged 15 through 18 years and among females with contraceptive use in the index quarter. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Human papillomavirus vaccination was not associated with increases in STIs in a large cohort of females, suggesting that vaccination is unlikely to promote unsafe sexual activity.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChlamydia InfectionsDatabases, FactualFemaleGonorrheaHerpes GenitalisHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceInsurance Claim ReviewLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesPapillomavirus VaccinesSexually Transmitted DiseasesSyphilisPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25664968
PMCPMC4465086
OpenAlexW2090685875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.