ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015
Incidence of sexually transmitted infections after human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent females.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes on community rates of HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Association between human papillomavirus and chlamydia trachomatis infection risk in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of public health · 2019Pooled it
- Tempest in a teapot: A systematic review of HPV vaccination and risk compensation research.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Pooled it
- Healthcare providers' beliefs and attitudes regarding risk compensation following HPV vaccination.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2016Trial
- Magnitude of human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and its determinants among adolescent girls in Lesotho: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among adolescent survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine on HPV type replacement and sexual behaviors in the post-vaccine era: A cross-sectional study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- A content analysis of religion and HPV vaccine news coverage in Canada.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Review of mathematical models of Neisseria gonorrhoeae vaccine impact: Implications for vaccine development.Vaccine · 2024Review
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Risk Behavior in Vaccinated and Non-Vaccinated Paraguayan Young Women.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccination at the first opportunity: An overview.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- Understanding Prognostic Factors for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Rural Community Case-Control Study.Vaccines · 2023Article
- The potential impact of a vaccine on Neisseria gonorrhoeae prevalence among heterosexuals living in a high prevalence setting.Vaccine · 2023Article
- Barriers and supports for uptake of human papillomavirus vaccination in Indigenous people globally: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Ten-Year Trend in Emergency Department Visits for Sexually Transmitted Infections among Adolescents: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Association of Maternal Cervical Disease With Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Offspring.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- HPV vaccine status and sexual behavior among young sexually-active women in the US: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2014.Health economics, policy, and law · 2020Article
- Article
- HPV vaccination has not increased sexual activity or accelerated sexual debut in a college-aged cohort of men and women.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Evaluating the impact of health policies: using a difference-in-differences approach.International journal of public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates among US females remain low, in part because of concerns that HPV vaccination may promote unsafe sexual activity by lowering perceived risks of acquiring a sexually transmitted infection (STI).
objectiveTo study whether HPV vaccination of females is associated with increases in STI rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsUsing a large, longitudinal insurance database of females aged 12 to 18 years insured from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2010, in the United States, we examined whether HPV vaccination was associated with an increase in incident STIs among females who were vaccinated compared with those who were not. We defined STIs as one or more medical claims for any of the following infections in a given quarter: chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, human immunodeficiency virus or AIDS, or syphilis. We used difference-in-difference analysis to compare changes in STI rates among HPV-vaccinated females before and after vaccination (index quarter) to changes among age-matched nonvaccinated females before and after the index quarter. We analyzed whether effects varied according to age and prior contraceptive medication use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of STIs.
resultsThe rates of STIs in the year before vaccination were higher among HPV-vaccinated females (94 of 21 610, 4.3 per 1000) compared with age-matched nonvaccinated females (522 of 186 501, 2.8 per 1000) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.09-1.71; P = .007). The rates of STIs increased for the vaccinated (147 of 21 610, 6.8 per 1000) and nonvaccinated (781 of 186 501, 4.2 per 1000) groups in the year after vaccination (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.25-1.79; P < .001). The difference-in-difference odds ratio was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.80-1.38; P = .74), implying that HPV vaccination was not associated with an increase in STIs relative to growth among nonvaccinated females. Similar associations held among subgroups aged 12 through 14 years and aged 15 through 18 years and among females with contraceptive use in the index quarter. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Human papillomavirus vaccination was not associated with increases in STIs in a large cohort of females, suggesting that vaccination is unlikely to promote unsafe sexual activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.