Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664771›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Engineering of Helicobacter pylori L-asparaginase: characterization of two functionally distinct groups of mutants.

Maristella Maggi, Laurent R Chiarelli, Giovanna Valentini, Claudia Scotti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enzyme Engineering Strategies for the Bioenhancement of L-Asparaginase Used as a Biopharmaceutical.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  3. Haematologica · 2023
    Article
  4. 3 Biotech · 2022
    Article
  5. Structural Aspects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recombinant l-Asparaginase II fromIndian journal of microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Enzymes in Metabolic Anticancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maristella MaggiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Immunology and General Pathology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Biology and Biotechnologies "Lazzaro Spallanzani", Laboratory of Protein Biochemistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Laurent R ChiarelliDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Lazzaro Spallanzani", Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanna ValentiniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Lazzaro Spallanzani", Laboratory of Protein Biochemistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Claudia ScottiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Immunology and General Pathology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial L-asparaginases have been used as anti-cancer drugs for over 4 decades though presenting, along with their therapeutic efficacy, several side effects due to their bacterial origin and, seemingly, to their secondary glutaminase activity. Helicobacter pylori type II L-asparaginase possesses interesting features, among which a reduced catalytic efficiency for L-GLN, compared to the drugs presently used in therapy. In the present study, we describe some enzyme variants with catalytic and in vitro cytotoxic activities different from the wild type enzyme. Particularly, replacements on catalytic threonines (T16D and T95E) deplete the enzyme of both its catalytic activities, once more underlining the essential role of such residues. One serendipitous mutant, M121C/T169M, had a preserved efficiency vs L-asparagine but was completely unable to carry out L-glutamine hydrolysis. Interestingly, this variant did not exert any cytotoxic effect on HL-60 cells. The M121C and T169M single mutants had reduced catalytic activities (nearly 2.5- to 4-fold vs wild type enzyme, respectively). Mutant Q63E, endowed with a similar catalytic efficiency versus asparagine and halved glutaminase efficiency with respect to the wild type enzyme, was able to exert a cytotoxic effect comparable to, or higher than, the one of the wild type enzyme when similar asparaginase units were used. These findings may be relevant to determine the role of glutaminase activity of L-asparaginase in the anti-proliferative effect of the drug and to shed light on how to engineer the best asparaginase/glutaminase combination for an ever improved, patients-tailored therapy.

Indexed as

MutationAmidohydrolasesAsparaginaseCatalytic DomainCell ProliferationGenetic EngineeringGlutaminaseHelicobacter pyloriHL-60 CellsHumansRecombinant ProteinsThreonineAmidohydrolasesAsparaginaseGlutaminaseglutamin-(asparagin-)aseRecombinant ProteinsThreonine

Identifiers

PMID25664771
PMCPMC4321988
OpenAlexW2064429896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.