Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664722›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2015

A global profile of replicative polymerase usage.

Yasukazu Daigaku, Andrea Keszthelyi, Carolin A Müller, Izumi Miyabe, Tony Brooks, Renata Retkute, Mike Hubank, Conrad A Nieduszynski, Antony M Carr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yasukazu Daigaku *Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Andrea Keszthelyi *Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Carolin A MüllerSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Izumi MiyabeGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Tony BrooksCentre for Translational Omics, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Renata RetkuteSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Mike HubankCentre for Translational Omics, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Conrad A NieduszynskiSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Antony M CarrGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
University of Sussex · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K007211/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K007211/2European Research Council 268788Medical Research Council G1100074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three eukaryotic DNA polymerases are essential for genome replication. Polymerase (Pol) α-primase initiates each synthesis event and is rapidly replaced by processive DNA polymerases: Polɛ replicates the leading strand, whereas Polδ performs lagging-strand synthesis. However, it is not known whether this division of labor is maintained across the whole genome or how uniform it is within single replicons. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we have developed a polymerase usage sequencing (Pu-seq) strategy to map polymerase usage genome wide. Pu-seq provides direct replication-origin location and efficiency data and indirect estimates of replication timing. We confirm that the division of labor is broadly maintained across an entire genome. However, our data suggest a subtle variability in the usage of the two polymerases within individual replicons. We propose that this results from occasional leading-strand initiation by Polδ followed by exchange for Polɛ.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticDNADNA Polymerase IDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationReplication OriginSchizosaccharomycesDNADNA Polymerase IDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase III

Identifiers

PMID25664722
PMCPMC4789492
OpenAlexW2025064120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.