Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664638›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2015

Quantitative assessments of the distinct contributions of polypeptide backbone amides versus side chain groups to chain expansion via chemical denaturation.

Alex S Holehouse, Kanchan Garai, Nicholas Lyle, Andreas Vitalis, Rohit V Pappu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Labile assembly of a tardigrade protein induces biostasis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex S HolehouseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Biological Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis , One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Kanchan Garai
Nicholas Lyle
Andreas Vitalis
Rohit V Pappu

Funding

ROLE OF CHAIN LENGTH AND SEQUENCE CONTEXTS ON POLYGLUTAMINE OLIGOMERIZATIONR01NS056114 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAPPU, ROHIT V · 2007 to 2020
$4.4M
HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMEDICAL IMAGING COMPUTER RESOURCESS10RR022984 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2009 to 2009
$1.9M
GPU COMPUTING RESOURCE TO ENABLE INNOVATION IN IMAGING AND NETWORK BIOLOGYS10OD018091 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAPPU, ROHIT V, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2014
$598k
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR022984NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022984NIH HHS 1S10OD018091NIH HHS S10 OD018091NINDS NIH HHS 5R01NS056114NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In aqueous solutions with high concentrations of chemical denaturants such as urea and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) proteins expand to populate heterogeneous conformational ensembles. These denaturing environments are thought to be good solvents for generic protein sequences because properties of conformational distributions align with those of canonical random coils. Previous studies showed that water is a poor solvent for polypeptide backbones, and therefore, backbones form collapsed globular structures in aqueous solvents. Here, we ask if polypeptide backbones can intrinsically undergo the requisite chain expansion in aqueous solutions with high concentrations of urea and GdmCl. We answer this question using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. We find that the degree of backbone expansion is minimal in aqueous solutions with high concentrations of denaturants. Instead, polypeptide backbones sample conformations that are denaturant-specific mixtures of coils and globules, with a persistent preference for globules. Therefore, typical denaturing environments cannot be classified as good solvents for polypeptide backbones. How then do generic protein sequences expand in denaturing environments? To answer this question, we investigated the effects of side chains using simulations of two archetypal sequences with amino acid compositions that are mixtures of charged, hydrophobic, and polar groups. We find that side chains lower the effective concentration of backbone amides in water leading to an intrinsic expansion of polypeptide backbones in the absence of denaturants. Additional dilution of the effective concentration of backbone amides is achieved through preferential interactions with denaturants. These effects lead to conformational statistics in denaturing environments that are congruent with those of canonical random coils. Our results highlight the role of side chain-mediated interactions as determinants of the conformational properties of unfolded states in water and in influencing chain expansion upon denaturation.

Indexed as

AmidesAmino Acid SequenceDose-Response Relationship, DrugGuanidineHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProtein DenaturationProtein Structure, SecondaryUreaWaterAmidesGuanidinePeptidespolyglycineUreaWater

Identifiers

PMID25664638
PMCPMC4418562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.