Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664565›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2015

Age differences in strategy selection and risk preference during risk-based decision making.

Rachel D Samson, Anu Venkatesh, Adam W Lester, A Tobias Weinstein, Peter Lipa, Carol A Barnes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel D SamsonEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
Anu VenkateshEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
Adam W LesterEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
A Tobias WeinsteinEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
Peter LipaEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
Carol A BarnesEvelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Cell Assemblies, Pattern Completion and the Aging BrainR37AG012609 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 2004 to 2013
$3.0M
CELL ASSEMBLIES, PATTERN COMPLETION, AND THE AGING BRAINR01AG012609 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 1994 to 2003
$1.2M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research SIB171357NIA NIH HHS AG012609NIA NIH HHS R01 AG012609NIA NIH HHS R37 AG012609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the effects of aging on decision making suggest that choices can be altered in a variety of ways depending on the situation, the nature of the outcome and risk, or certainty levels. To better characterize how aging impacts decision making in rodents, young and aged Fischer 344 rats underwent a series of probabilistic discounting tasks in which reward magnitude and probabilities were manipulated. Young rats tended to choose 1 of 2 different strategies: (a) to press for the large/uncertain reward, regardless of the reward probability; or (b) to continually adapt their behavior according to the odds of winning. The first strategy was adopted by about half of the younger rats, the second by the remaining young animals and the entire group of aged rats. Additionally, we found that when the odds of winning were varied from uncertain to certain during a session, aged rats chose most often the lever associated with the small/certain reward. This is consistent with an interpretation of increased risk aversion. When this behavior was further characterized using a lose-shift analysis, it appears that older rats exhibited an increased sensitivity to negative feedback. In contrast, sensitivity to wins was unaltered in aged rats compared with young, suggesting that aging selectively impacts rat's behavior following losses. In line with some human aging studies, it appears that aged rats are either more risk averse or have a greater certainty bias, which may result from age differences in emotion regulation.

Indexed as

AgingRewardRiskAnimalsDelay DiscountingMaleRatsRats, Inbred F344

Identifiers

PMID25664565
PMCPMC4526244
OpenAlexW2140580587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.