Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664543›Full record

ArticleNature methods2015

Accurate liability estimation improves power in ascertained case-control studies.

Omer Weissbrod, Christoph Lippert, Dan Geiger, David Heckerman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling the genotype by environment interaction in a thermosensitive fish with a polygenic sex determination system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Robust genetic interaction analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omer WeissbrodComputer Science Department, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Christoph LipperteScience Group, Microsoft Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000000163632556
Dan GeigerComputer Science Department, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
David HeckermaneScience Group, Microsoft Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear mixed models (LMMs) have emerged as the method of choice for confounded genome-wide association studies. However, the performance of LMMs in nonrandomly ascertained case-control studies deteriorates with increasing sample size. We propose a framework called LEAP (liability estimator as a phenotype; https://github.com/omerwe/LEAP) that tests for association with estimated latent values corresponding to severity of phenotype, and we demonstrate that this can lead to a substantial power increase.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesBiostatisticsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, TheoreticalMultiple SclerosisSample Size

Identifiers

PMID25664543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.