Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664222›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports

Dietary Patterns, Genes, and Health: Challenges and Obstacles to be Overcome.

Alexis C Frazier-Wood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Personalised nutrition and health.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Associations between Dietary Factors and Self-Reported Physical Health in Chinese Scientific Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexis C Frazier-WoodUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA.

Funding

Genomewide Association Study of Lipid Response to Fenofibrate and Dietary FatR01HL091357 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2008 to 2018
$5.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several dietary approaches have been proposed to prevent the onset of chronic diseases. As yet, no single approach has emerged as having the most consistent health benefits. This arises, in part, due to the fact that diet influences health in the context of individual factors with genetic components. Therefore, the effects of diet on health may be dependent on an individual's genetic background. At this time we lack robust evidence for the effects of interactions between genes and dietary patterns on health. To understand why, I will briefly review the most methodologically strong attempts to identify gene-diet interactions, which will illuminate how the challenges facing all of genetic research apply to the search for gene-diet interactions. Then I will discuss some ways in which these challenges are being addressed that offer hope for the future in which the best diet for an individual is identified based on their genetic variation.

Indexed as

Gene–diet interactionsGenome-wide interaction studyGWIS methodologyNutrigenomicsObesity

Identifiers

PMID25664222
PMCPMC4315873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.